FE-817: Add supply chain site + product dashboard, Rudderstack telemetry handling

[CiaranMn]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

1. Adds a /supply-chain dashboard with a site-level and product-level view, including analysis on step and end-to-end pipeline, inventory dwell cost, and planning parameter calibration.
2. Implement Rudderstack telemetry tracking

🚫 Blocked by

• Based on BE-610: Add migration for generic supply chain ontology #8872, needs that merging into main first
• AI reviews

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Tests added as part of this PR.

❓ How to test this?

1. TODO

📹 Demo

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 29, 2026 10:31am

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Jun 29, 2026 10:31am
petrinaut	Skipped		Jun 29, 2026 10:31am

[cursor]

PR Summary

High Risk
New authenticated analysis endpoint presigns storage keys (tenant isolation is critical), plus large ontology migrations and telemetry/auth identity changes on registration.

Overview
Replaces Snowplow product telemetry with Rudderstack (HASH_API_RUDDERSTACK_KEY, ENVIRONMENT for event labels), adds a server telemetry gateway and registration/analysis_run tracking, and drops Snowplow env/docs.

Adds an authenticated POST /api/analysis batch gateway that resolves named analyses (starting with supply-chain) to web-scoped S3 artifacts via presigned URLs, with slug validation, role checks, rate limits, and unit tests. Seeds a vendored demo dataset into example-org and a dev:import-supply-chain-data CLI to publish external JSON into the same storage layout.

Expands the system ontology with ISO 4217 currencies, a large supply-chain type set (materials, orders, sites, shipments, units, etc.), and opportunity status / supply-chain user preferences entity types; moves currency seeding from a dev-only migration into production migration 025.

Introduces isStagingEnv / ENVIRONMENT-aware prod detection, staging email subject prefixes, higher GraphQL rate limits for signed-in users, and a small Cursor naming rule for TypeScript identifiers.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 894722d. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.69%. Comparing base (bedc578) to head (d55b38f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           asa/supply-chain    #8908      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             59.24%   59.69%   +0.45%     
====================================================
  Files                  1349     1351       +2     
  Lines                130165   132116    +1951     
  Branches               5898     5942      +44     
====================================================
+ Hits                  77115    78866    +1751     
- Misses                52142    52343     +201     
+ Partials                908      907       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.81% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.18% <ø> (+0.18%)	⬆️
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.19% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.53% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	29.44% <ø> (+2.60%)	⬆️
rust.hash-graph-store	37.99% <ø> (-0.08%)	⬇️
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	79.60% <ø> (-0.24%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.31% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	75.23% <ø> (-0.77%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.45% <ø> (+1.36%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request because it exceeds the maximum number of files (300). Try reducing the number of changed files and requesting a review from Copilot again.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing cm/add-supply-chain-dashboard (d55b38f) with main (b8f5e58)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on asa/supply-chain (bedc578) during the generation of this report, so main (b8f5e58) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.766 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.373 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.843 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 40.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.599 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 35.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.400 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.948 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.421 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.301 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$36.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$33.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$43.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$41.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 575 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.90 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}59.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$284 \mathrm{ms} \pm 984 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 70.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.553 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$11.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.724 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$10.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.153 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$10.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.087 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$11.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 102 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.893 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$11.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.879 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$11.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.972 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.007 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$11.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.752 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$60.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 462 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 617 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 544 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$77.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.966 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$85.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$91.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 533 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.970 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 547 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$53.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 434 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.183 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 637 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 719 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.126 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$19.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.828 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$533 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.37 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.647 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 894722d. Configure here.}

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review this pull request because it exceeds the maximum number of files (300). Try reducing the number of changed files and requesting a review from Copilot again.