SRE-325: Disable Cargo terminal progress for codegen script

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR sets the CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never environment variable for the yarn codegen command to suppress Cargo progress output during code generation, ensuring consistent and cleaner terminal output.

🔗 Related links

• SRE-325

🔍 What does this change?

• Updates the codegen script in the root package.json to include CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never, aligning it with other turbo commands in the repository that already use this environment variable

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

• Existing CI/CD pipeline will verify the codegen command continues to work correctly

❓ How to test this?

1. Checkout the branch
2. Run yarn codegen
3. Confirm that Cargo progress bars are not displayed in the terminal output

---

This PR was created by Graphite Agent

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 24, 2026 10:16am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 24, 2026 10:16am

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.19%. Comparing base (9125fd4) to head (bef7ad9).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8322      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.19%   60.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1232     1232              
  Lines      118007   118007              
  Branches     5135     5135              
==========================================
- Hits        71030    71029       -1     
- Misses      46151    46152       +1     
  Partials      826      826              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	88.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing graphite-agent/6133-h-xxxx_disable_cargo_terminal_progress_for_codegen_script (bef7ad9) with main (9125fd4)}

Summary

✅ 18 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[cursor]

PR Summary

Aligns codegen with other scripts that suppress Cargo progress for cleaner logs.

• Updates package.json scripts.codegen to CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never turbo codegen

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit bef7ad9. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Suppresses Cargo progress output during yarn codegen to keep code generation logs clean and consistent.
Change: Prefixes the root codegen script with CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never, matching other turbo scripts in the repo.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-39.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$11.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-59.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.397 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.555 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.986 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.74 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.61 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 809 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$282 \mathrm{ms} \pm 778 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.786 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.894 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 136 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 294 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 292 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$95.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.840 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 423 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$60.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$68.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.852 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.989 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$50.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$78.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.355 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 395 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.250 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 563 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 492 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$583 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph