Update Rust crate time to v0.3.47 - autoclosed

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
time (source)	workspace.dependencies	patch	0.3.44 -> 0.3.47

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

time-rs/time (time)

v0.3.47

Compare Source

Security

• The possibility of a stack exhaustion denial of service attack when parsing RFC 2822 has been
  eliminated. Previously, it was possible to craft input that would cause unbounded recursion. Now,
  the depth of the recursion is tracked, causing an error to be returned if it exceeds a reasonable
  limit.

  This attack vector requires parsing user-provided input, with any type, using the RFC 2822 format.

Compatibility

• Attempting to format a value with a well-known format (i.e. RFC 3339, RFC 2822, or ISO 8601) will
  error at compile time if the type being formatted does not provide sufficient information. This
  would previously fail at runtime. Similarly, attempting to format a value with ISO 8601 that is
  only configured for parsing (i.e. Iso8601::PARSING) will error at compile time.

Added

• Builder methods for format description modifiers, eliminating the need for verbose initialization
  when done manually.
• date!(2026-W01-2) is now supported. Previously, a space was required between W and 01.
• [end] now has a trailing_input modifier which can either be prohibit (the default) or
  discard. When it is discard, all remaining input is ignored. Note that if there are components
  after [end], they will still attempt to be parsed, likely resulting in an error.

Changed

• More performance gains when parsing.

Fixed

• If manually formatting a value, the number of bytes written was one short for some components.
  This has been fixed such that the number of bytes written is always correct.
• The possibility of integer overflow when parsing an owned format description has been effectively
  eliminated. This would previously wrap when overflow checks were disabled. Instead of storing the
  depth as u8, it is stored as u32. This would require multiple gigabytes of nested input to
  overflow, at which point we've got other problems and trivial mitigations are available by
  downstream users.

v0.3.46

Compare Source

Added

• All possible panics are now documented for the relevant methods.

• The need to use #[serde(default)] when using custom serde formats is documented. This applies
  only when deserializing an Option<T>.

• Duration::nanoseconds_i128 has been made public, mirroring
  std::time::Duration::from_nanos_u128.

• Various methods for truncating components have been added, avoiding the need to call the fallible
  replace methods multiple times.

  For PrimitiveDateTime, UtcDateTime, and OffsetDateTime:

  • truncate_to_day

  For Time, PrimitiveDateTime, UtcDateTime, and OffsetDateTime:

  • truncate_to_hour
  • truncate_to_minute
  • truncate_to_second
  • truncate_to_millisecond
  • truncate_to_microsecond

Changed

• The minimum supported Rust version is now 1.88.0.
• Significant performance gains in numerous locations. No public APIs were changed or removed as
  part of this.
• The size of error::ComponentRange, along with types that contain it, has been significantly
  reduced.

Fixed

• The PartialOrd and Ord implementations of UtcOffset now return the expected result.

v0.3.45

Compare Source

Added

• time::format_description::StaticFormatDescription type alias for &'static [BorrowedFormatItem<'static>]. This is the type returned by the
  time::macros::format_description! macro.

Changed

• The minimum supported Rust version is now 1.83.0.
• All floating point methods on Duration are now const fn.
• All setters on Parsed are now const fn.
• The serde dependency has been replaced with serde_core, This reduces compile times by not
  including unused parts of serde.
• Date::from_julian_day uses a new algorithm, resulting in an approximately 16% performance
  improvement. This method is used internally by numerous other methods.
• util::is_leap_year uses a new algorithm, resulting in an approximately 8% performance
  improvement.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only dependency bump to the time ecosystem; behavior changes are limited to upstream crate updates (including a security fix) with no direct code changes in this repo.

Overview
Updates the Rust time crate from 0.3.44 to 0.3.47 via Cargo.lock, pulling in corresponding updates to time-core and time-macros and bumping num-conv.

The lockfile also reflects time switching its serialization dependency from serde to serde_core as part of the upstream update.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e22ce41. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates the Rust time crate dependency from 0.3.44 to 0.3.45 (Renovate bump).

Notes: This PR only updates the lockfile; there are no application/source code changes included.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.10%. Comparing base (1492bce) to head (e22ce41).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8272   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.10%   60.10%           
=======================================
  Files        1235     1235           
  Lines      118201   118201           
  Branches     5180     5180           
=======================================
  Hits        71050    71050           
  Misses      46324    46324           
  Partials      827      827           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.41% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	10.88% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.47% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	25.61% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	30.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	46.65% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.77% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	68.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.10% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.91% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing deps/rs/time-0.x-lockfile (e22ce41) with main (1492bce)¹}

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run²

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on main (6a02553) during the generation of this report, so 1492bce was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

2. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[TimDiekmann]

Requesting changes to prevent Renovate spamming me with failed merges. Feel free to dismiss when resolved.

error: failed to resolve: could not find `ContentVisitor` in `de`
   ┌─ libs/@local/graph/temporal-versioning/src/temporal_bound.rs:11:21
   │
11 │ #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize)]
   │                     ^^^^^^^^^^^
   │
   ┌─ /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/serde-1.0.228/src/private/de.rs:12:10
   │
12 │ #[cfg(any(feature = "std", feature = "alloc"))]
   │          ------------------------------------ found an item that was configured out
   │
   ┌─ /home/runner/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f/serde-1.0.228/src/private/de.rs:14:75
   │
14 │     content_as_str, Content, ContentDeserializer, ContentRefDeserializer, ContentVisitor,
   │                                                                           -------------- found an item that was configured out
   │

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 5, 2026 8:11am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 5, 2026 8:11am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 5, 2026 8:11am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Feb 5, 2026 8:11am

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.120 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$23.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 119 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.461 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.198 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.15 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.93 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.61 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$38.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$74.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.726 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.456 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$419 \mathrm{ms} \pm 969 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 394 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$84.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.246 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$281 \mathrm{ms} \pm 601 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 71.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 76.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.626 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$28.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$28.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.859 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.546 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.611 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$7.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$59.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 378 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$67.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$49.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$76.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$56.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$63.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$66.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$65.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 582 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$137 \mathrm{ms} \pm 563 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 556 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$562 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph