Robust applications: add more language around tools with a runtime vs no-runtime#2462
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
PascalSenn
approved these changes
Jul 2, 2026
Contributor
|
@martinbonnin +1 for |
martinbonnin
changed the title
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
%future added valuecan be confusing so it's worth adding some extra language. Thanks @PascalSenn for raising this. Let me know how that looks.@eddeee888 the more I look into this, the more I think
%future added valueshould more be like%do not use this value, add a default case instead