Skip to content

Reduce log levels for registry connection checks#3516

Open
mbg wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
mbg/start-proxy/reduce-connection-check-severity
Open

Reduce log levels for registry connection checks#3516
mbg wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
mbg/start-proxy/reduce-connection-check-severity

Conversation

@mbg
Copy link
Member

@mbg mbg commented Feb 26, 2026

Reduces the log levels of the connection check messages, to reduce noise from workflow annotations

Note: liner failures are unrelated to this PR and will be resolved by #3512

Risk assessment

For internal use only. Please select the risk level of this change:

  • Low risk: Changes are fully under feature flags, or have been fully tested and validated in pre-production environments and are highly observable, or are documentation or test only.

Which use cases does this change impact?

Workflow types:

  • Managed - Impacts users with dynamic workflows (Default Setup, Code Quality, ...).

Products:

  • Code Scanning - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-scanning.
  • Code Quality - The changes impact analyses when analysis-kinds: code-quality.

Environments:

  • Dotcom - Impacts CodeQL workflows on github.com and/or GitHub Enterprise Cloud with Data Residency.

How did/will you validate this change?

  • Unit tests - I am depending on unit test coverage (i.e. tests in .test.ts files).
  • End-to-end tests - I am depending on PR checks (i.e. tests in pr-checks).

If something goes wrong after this change is released, what are the mitigation and rollback strategies?

  • Rollback - Change can only be disabled by rolling back the release or releasing a new version with a fix.

How will you know if something goes wrong after this change is released?

  • Telemetry - I rely on existing telemetry or have made changes to the telemetry.
    • Dashboards - I will watch relevant dashboards for issues after the release. Consider whether this requires this change to be released at a particular time rather than as part of a regular release.
    • Alerts - New or existing monitors will trip if something goes wrong with this change.

Are there any special considerations for merging or releasing this change?

  • No special considerations - This change can be merged at any time.

Merge / deployment checklist

  • Confirm this change is backwards compatible with existing workflows.
  • Consider adding a changelog entry for this change.
  • Confirm the readme and docs have been updated if necessary.

@mbg mbg self-assigned this Feb 26, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Should be very easy to review label Feb 26, 2026
@mbg mbg marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2026 15:16
@mbg mbg requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2026 15:16
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 26, 2026 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Should be very easy to review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant