📢 FINAL WARNING: The Fall of the Shield – Why are you aiding the vulnerabilities instead of the protectors?

[asrar-mared]

⚠️ THE LAST CONTRIBUTION - THE END OF ZAYED SHIELD ⚠️

Is this how the story ends? I spent nights building a fortress of 112,000 commits and 9.5GB of security intelligence from a mobile phone, only to find that GitHub’s administration prioritizes a $10 sync error over global security infrastructure.

🛡️ TO THE ADMINISTRATION:

You have placed 'the enemy' (vulnerabilities) in a position of power by blocking the 'shield' (my work). While I waited for a human response, you hid behind automated 'busy' queues.

I was never here for a reward. I was here to protect. But it seems you prefer a platform filled with security debt rather than supporting elite-level, independent engineering.

⚔️ MY FINAL DECISION:

If this is how GitHub treats its most dedicated security contributors, then there is no place for me here. This is my last day. If my access and contribution status are not manually rectified immediately:

1. I will withdraw the GLOBAL-ADVISORY-ARCHIVE.
2. I will delete all repositories and automated workflows (Zayed Shield).
3. I will take this 100K+ intelligence database to a platform that values security over bureaucracy.

The community will know that the "Shield" fell not because of hackers, but because of GitHub's administration.

"The shield is leaving. Let the vulnerabilities feast on your silence."

— asrar-mared (صائد الثغرات) 🛡️⚔️

[asrar-mared]

Subject: Technical Bureaucracy vs. Global Security: My Contribution is Blocked by a $10 Paywall
"Is this how GitHub rewards global security contributors?
I have independently archived and managed over 112,000 commits and 9.5GB of critical security advisories (Zayed Shield). I am doing this from a mobile device, overcoming hardware limitations that would stop most engineers.
Now, I find my entire workflow halted, and my contributions to the global security community 'on hold' because of a $10 fee related to storage or actions. It is absurd that a platform claiming to support open-source progress is bottlenecking a massive security archive—which thousands of developers rely on—over a few dollars.
I am not here for the money; I am here to contribute to global safety. If the 'Global Advisory' progress stops because your system prioritizes $10 over critical security data synchronization, then there is a serious flaw in GitHub's leadership.
Do not block the flow of security intelligence. Fix the indexing, merge the pending contributions, and let the work of 'asrar-mared' continue. Security wait for no one, and it certainly shouldn't wait for a $10 transaction."