-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
feat(replay): Add agent-readable replay timelines #913
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dcramer
wants to merge
13
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
codex/replay-agent-analysis
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ea6c53a
[codex] Paginate replay segment downloads (#910)
dcramer a3ae0f3
feat(replay): Add agent-readable replay timelines
dcramer 075bc41
fix(replay): Clarify friction filtering
dcramer 239e2ea
fix(replay): Normalize log levels case-insensitively
dcramer fe3b35a
fix(replay): Tighten route path filtering
dcramer b675f5a
feat(replay): Summarize route visits chronologically
dcramer 55182be
feat(replay): Surface recording parser context
dcramer 8185730
fix(replay): Fill client-filtered list pages
dcramer 8c8f338
fix(replay): Avoid duplicate URL filters
dcramer 97de06c
fix(replay): Preserve filtered replay pagination
dcramer bcea1b6
fix(replay): Validate event window flags
dcramer 8b9a386
fix(replay): Cap replay list page size
dcramer 17b8e28
feat(replay): Simplify replay event MVP
dcramer File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | ||
| /** | ||
| * sentry replay event | ||
| * | ||
| * Inspect normalized events from Session Replay recordings. | ||
| */ | ||
|
|
||
| import { buildRouteMap } from "../../../lib/route-map.js"; | ||
| import { listCommand } from "./list.js"; | ||
|
|
||
| export const eventRoute = buildRouteMap({ | ||
| routes: { | ||
| list: listCommand, | ||
| }, | ||
| defaultCommand: "list", | ||
| docs: { | ||
| brief: "Inspect normalized replay events", | ||
| fullDescription: | ||
| "Inspect normalized events extracted from Session Replay recordings.\n\n" + | ||
| "Commands:\n" + | ||
| " list List normalized replay events\n\n" + | ||
| "Alias: `sentry replay events` → `sentry replay event list`", | ||
| hideRoute: {}, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); |
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we can make this an optional positional argument instead as it looks quite common and looks like a natural sub-section?