Skip to content

chore: move the default thunderbird flatpak to the new one#196

Merged
inffy merged 1 commit into
get-aurora-dev:mainfrom
inffy:new-thunderbird
May 30, 2026
Merged

chore: move the default thunderbird flatpak to the new one#196
inffy merged 1 commit into
get-aurora-dev:mainfrom
inffy:new-thunderbird

Conversation

@inffy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@inffy inffy commented May 30, 2026

The old has been linked to the "new" esr one, so this will use the newer base one by defaul

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 30, 2026 12:28
@inffy inffy requested review from NiHaiden, ledif and renner0e as code owners May 30, 2026 12:28
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates Aurora’s default system Flatpak list to use the newer official Thunderbird Flatpak ID.

Changes:

  • Replaces the legacy org.mozilla.Thunderbird Flatpak ID with org.mozilla.thunderbird.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@inffy inffy enabled auto-merge May 30, 2026 12:59
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@renner0e renner0e left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense, we should be shipping the non-ESR one

@inffy inffy added this pull request to the merge queue May 30, 2026
Merged via the queue into get-aurora-dev:main with commit 6595e45 May 30, 2026
3 checks passed
@inffy inffy deleted the new-thunderbird branch May 30, 2026 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants