Clarify the two accountability boundaries - #47
Merged
Conversation
jmchilton
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 19:01
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
The previous page treated provenance and the external check as if they were two similar things an artifact carries. They answer different accountability questions at different points in the lifecycle. Leading with those boundaries makes the argument easier to understand and keeps the page aligned with the Model and Guiding Principles.
Validation
npm test— 22 tests passednpm run typecheck— 0 errors (one pre-existing unused-index hint)npm run build— 28 pages built; wiki-link check cleangit diff --check