plugin: address provisioning workflow review#118
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (32)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
gaelic-ghost
force-pushed
the
plugin/apple-developer-portal
branch
from
5bf510f to
f733d13
Compare
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5bf510f0fb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| config["settings"].update(override.get("settings") or {}) | ||
| config["isCustomized"] = True | ||
| write(config) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When apply --input receives an allowed setting key with an invalid value (for example preferredDiscoveryMode: portal), load() only checks the key name, then this merge writes the bad value without rerunning the enum checks from effective(). That makes apply report success while leaving a durable customization file that causes subsequent effective/set runs to exit until the user manually edits or resets it, contrary to the documented “validated override” contract.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary\n- restore the shared customization apply/reset contract\n- tighten .p8/JWT storage guidance\n- remove Gale-specific TTS lifecycle text from the generic shared Xcode snippet\n- synchronize the SwiftData snippet copy\n\n## Verification\n- bash plugins/apple-dev-skills/.github/scripts/validate_repo_docs.sh\n- uv run pytest (plugins/apple-dev-skills; 197 passed)\n- uv run scripts/validate_socket_metadata.py