docs: enforce strict XcodeGen roots#111
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (8)
📒 Files selected for processing (69)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR bumps the version string from 8.5.1 to 8.5.2 across numerous plugin.json and pyproject.toml files, and separately overhauls Apple Xcode/XcodeGen project-structure guidance: a single app lifecycle entry point rule and revised broad-top-level syncedFolder source-root rules are propagated across a shared snippet, per-skill snippet copies, workflow docs, a migration audit script, a project template, and tests. ChangesPlugin/package version bumps
Apple Xcode/XcodeGen project-structure guidance overhaul
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)Not applicable — the changes are primarily documentation guidance edits and a script/audit logic update within a single tool, without multi-component request/response flows. Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels: ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Tools execution failed with the following error: Failed to run tools: 13 INTERNAL: Received RST_STREAM with code 2 (Internal server error) Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 33dfe0a466
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| + ", ".join(project_yml_audit["fragmented_source_entries"]) | ||
| + ". Use one Sources entry for the app target, one Tests entry for the test target, and one entry per separate top-level logical root only." | ||
| ) | ||
| if len(file_audit["app_entry_points"]) > 1: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Scope app entry-point checks per target
In projects with more than one native target under Sources (for example a main app plus a helper/widget app, each with its own @main), file_audit["app_entry_points"] is a repo-wide list, so this condition recommends collapsing valid per-target entry points into a single app target entry point. That audit output can lead the migration workflow to remove required launch boundaries; the check should use target/source membership, or at least only compare entry points within the same app target, before flagging.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Verification
Summary by CodeRabbit