Addition of the Orchestrator #5
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…etes config files
frouioui
added
enhancement
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Experimental addition of the Orchestrator in the Vitess cluster, with the operator, as mentioned in #2.
In my understanding, and after a chat on Vitess' Slack, some work is currently ongoing in order to fully support Orchestrator by the Kubernetes Operator of planetscale, as detailed in planetscale/vitess-operator/pull/130 and vitessio/vitess/pull/6714.
The default
operator.yamlthat #1 is using seems to not be sufficient for the integration of the Orchestrator.