Skip to content

out_loki: make it clear setting labels removes the keys from record#1536

Open
ajantti wants to merge 1 commit intofluent:masterfrom
ajantti:master
Open

out_loki: make it clear setting labels removes the keys from record#1536
ajantti wants to merge 1 commit intofluent:masterfrom
ajantti:master

Conversation

@ajantti
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ajantti ajantti commented Dec 25, 2024

Related to the pull request fluent/fluent-bit#9766 The documentation doesn't make it clear, but the code seems to be trying to work this way.

Also minor typo fix.

@patrick-stephens
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution but please resolve the DCO requirements - we cannot merge without it unfortunately.

@eschabell eschabell self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell eschabell added waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor labels Oct 21, 2025
@eschabell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ajantti I've nudged the code PR fluent/fluent-bit#9766 for review to get that moved forward, once that is merged, this docs PR could merge if you could please fix the current conflicts?

@eschabell eschabell requested a review from esmerel October 21, 2025 20:28
@eschabell
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@esmerel another one to review and not merge please, just need the review!

@eschabell eschabell added the waiting-on-review Waiting on a review from mainteners label Oct 21, 2025
@esmerel esmerel removed conflict Waiting on conflict to be resolved by contributor waiting-for-user Waiting for user/contributors feedback or requested changes waiting-on-review Waiting on a review from mainteners labels Oct 28, 2025
@ajantti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

ajantti commented Nov 5, 2025

Sorry for taking a while. The conflict was in a minor typo fix, but I hope the thing I wrote about the labels is correct. It's just a clarification on how I think it's supposed to work, based on the pull request fluent/fluent-bit#9766

Although, as mentioned in the comments of the pull request, I think it might've been already accidentally fixed in master by fluent/fluent-bit#10563 (albeit with some inefficiencies)

@ajantti ajantti force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from c116813 to fc010c6 Compare November 5, 2025 03:19
The documentation doesn't make it clear, but the code seems to be
trying to work this way.

Signed-off-by: jantti <jantti@tri-ace.co.jp>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants