feat(vendor): add The Graph + pattern: Reproducible Audit Extraction - #186
Open
p-diogo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
feat(vendor): add The Graph + pattern: Reproducible Audit Extraction#186p-diogo wants to merge 1 commit into
p-diogo wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
p-diogo
force-pushed
the
feat/vendor-the-graph
branch
from
August 5, 2026 23:34
56de416 to
cde2eb9
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What are you adding?
Description
Adds
vendors/the-graph.mdandpatterns/pattern-reproducible-audit-extraction.md.The gap
Several cards assume a read leg without naming it.
pattern-l2-encrypted-offchain-audit,pattern-regulatory-disclosure-keys-proofsandpattern-commit-and-proveall depend on someone serving the anchors an auditor checks a disclosure against, without saying who does that or what makes it trustworthy.The pattern
Reproducible Audit Extraction fills that in: deterministic extraction to content-addressed inputs, a versioned transform, and a re-execution manifest, so a verifier can re-derive the figure byte-identically and pin any disagreement to a specific input or code version.
No implementation is named in the body,
composes_withpoints at four of your cards, andopen_source_implementationslists six tools, three of which aren't ours.The limits are stated rather than implied: re-execution is the trust mechanism, a serving layer never replaces it, completeness covers on-chain emissions rather than off-chain reality, and attestations are signatures rather than validity proofs.
The vendor entry
We build one implementation of it. The card grades itself down where that's accurate: query privacy is absent, there is no SLA, and hosted delivery reintroduces single-operator trust.
On CROPS
I left the per-card table out because it looks like you've moved away from it. #130 added
QA-AUDIT.md, whose item 6 settled on 2026-06-24 to treat CROPS as a selection guideline rather than per-card scoring, and the same PR stripped the inline profile fromvendors/peer.md.Also, the vendor
_template.mdstill shows the table, though it hasn't changed since March. Either way the four dimensions are covered in the card's prose. Happy to add the table if you would rather have it.Checklist