Skip to content

[DO NOT REVIEW] - Mappings investigation for entity analytic's graph component#19638

Draft
kfirpeled wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
siem/p1-integrations-mappings
Draft

[DO NOT REVIEW] - Mappings investigation for entity analytic's graph component#19638
kfirpeled wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
siem/p1-integrations-mappings

Conversation

@kfirpeled

@kfirpeled kfirpeled commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Proposed commit message

The PR is for learning purposes and temporary knowledge sharing

With usage of LLM we automate the process of enhancing the ingest pipeline of integrations based on data samples exists today.

@elasticmachine

elasticmachine commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@andrewkroh andrewkroh added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files. label Jun 18, 2026
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Benchmarks report

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TL;DR

The seven Buildkite package checks failed, but the available logs only contain stack teardown/artifact-upload output, not the actual test failure. I could not identify a defensible code root cause from the supplied data; the PR diff also does not touch any of the failed package directories.

Remediation

  • Open the private Buildkite job logs or the uploaded build/test-results/*.xml artifacts for the failed package jobs and inspect the first <failure>/<error> entry.
  • If the artifacts show only wrapper/teardown output as well, retry the Buildkite build because the diagnostic data for the failing command was not captured in the accessible logs.
Investigation details

Root Cause

Inconclusive: the failing command is known, but the concrete assertion/error is not present in the available log files.

The PR changed 140 files under dev/domain/** and dev/target-fields-audit/**; none of the failed package paths are modified:

  • packages/cloud_security_posture/
  • packages/cursor/
  • packages/fortinet_fortiedr/
  • packages/google_scc/
  • packages/netbox/
  • packages/rapid7_insightvm/
  • packages/tenable_io/

Evidence

  • Build: https://buildkite.com/elastic/integrations/builds/44742
  • Failed jobs: Check integrations cloud_security_posture, cursor, fortinet_fortiedr, google_scc, netbox, rapid7_insightvm, tenable_io
  • Commands all failed via .buildkite/scripts/test_one_package.sh packages/<package> origin/main 56068ea99db009b273b41acc6161143953fd7ed6
  • Key accessible log excerpt for each job only shows the wrapper failure after teardown, e.g.:
--- [cursor] failed
^^^ +++
🚨 Error: The command exited with status 1
^^^ +++
user command error: exit status 1
~~~ Uploading artifacts

The Buildkite public step metadata lists the jobs as hard_failed, but the REST log endpoint returns Authentication required, and no local build/test-results artifacts were present to inspect.

Verification

  • Checked PR metadata and changed-file list through GitHub MCP.
  • Checked the pre-fetched Buildkite event, failure summary, and all seven log files under /tmp/gh-aw/buildkite-logs/.
  • Checked for local build/test-results artifacts; none were available.
  • Did not run the package checks locally because these integration checks require Docker/Elastic stack execution, and Docker-in-Docker is not available in this environment.

Follow-up

The next actionable step is to inspect the private Buildkite artifacts for the failing test XML. Without those artifacts or full logs, any package-level fix recommendation would be speculative.


What is this? | From workflow: PR Buildkite Detective

Give us feedback! React with 🚀 if perfect, 👍 if helpful, 👎 if not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants