[Security] Elastic Defend support for remote output and CCS - #7565
[Security] Elastic Defend support for remote output and CCS#7565natasha-moore-elastic wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Elastic Docs AI PR menuCheck the box to run an AI review for this pull request.
Powered by GitHub Agentic Workflows and docs-actions. For more information, reach out to the docs team. |
Elastic Docs Style Checker (Vale)Summary: 1 suggestion found 💡 Suggestions (1): Optional style improvements. Apply when helpful.
The Vale linter checks documentation changes against the Elastic Docs style guide. To use Vale locally or report issues, refer to Elastic style guide for Vale. |
florent-leborgne
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with 1 suggestion
leemthompo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me, with one nit: the standard CCS terminology is "local (and remote) cluster" but this PR uses "management cluster" throughout (and "main cluster" once).
Don't know if it makes sense to align :)
Co-authored-by: Florent LB <florent.leborgne@elastic.co>
Hey @leemthompo, thanks for flagging this, I'll update the PR to use that term instead. 👍 |
Documents support for using Elastic Defend with a remote Elasticsearch output, available on Elastic Stack deployments starting in 9.5. When agents use a remote Elasticsearch output, their endpoint data is written to the remote cluster, and the management cluster reads it back using cross-cluster search.
Changes:
Resolves #7220
Made with Cursor