build: adopt baselibs-style toolchain settings by FScholPer · Pull Request #5 · eclipse-score/inc_diagnostics

FScholPer · 2026-06-24T12:01:54Z

Summary

Aligns .bazelrc and MODULE.bazel with the build configuration used in eclipse-score/baselibs so that code compiles with the correct S-CORE certified toolchains (GCC 12.2.0 / Ferrocene Rust).

Changes

`MODULE.bazel`

Add score_bazel_cpp_toolchains GCC extension — declares score_gcc_x86_64_toolchain (x86_64/Linux, GCC 12.2.0) and score_gcc_aarch64_toolchain
Add score_toolchains_rust 0.8.0 (Ferrocene Rust toolchain)
Add platforms + score_bazel_platforms dependencies
Upgrade score_docs_as_code to 2.0.3 (compatibility level 2, required by transitive score_process dependency — fixes ERROR: score_process@1.3.2 depends on score_docs_as_code@2.0.3 with compatibility level 2)
Align rules_python, rules_rust, rules_cc, googletest, score_tooling, aspect_rules_lint, buildifier_prebuilt to versions actually resolved by the dependency graph (removes all --check_direct_dependencies warnings)

`.bazelrc`

Add HTTP retry / timeout settings matching baselibs (http_connector_attempts, http_timeout_scaling)
Register GCC x86_64 + Ferrocene as common extra toolchains for host (required for proc-macro metadata compatibility)
Add _bl_stub config: baselibs required flags (nlohmann JSON backend, use_typedshmd=False, warning features)
Add _bl_toolchain_common config: incompatible_strict_action_env, host_platform=@score_bazel_platforms//:x86_64-linux
Add bl-x86_64-linux named build config targeting x86_64-linux-gcc_12.2.0-posix

Verified

bazel build --config=bl-x86_64-linux //score/...
INFO: Found 19 targets...
INFO: 77 processes: 31 internal, 46 processwrapper-sandbox.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 77 total actions

Aligns .bazelrc and MODULE.bazel with the toolchain configuration used in eclipse-score/baselibs so that code compiles with the correct S-CORE certified toolchains. MODULE.bazel changes: - Add score_bazel_cpp_toolchains GCC extension: declares score_gcc_x86_64_toolchain (x86_64/Linux, GCC 12.2.0) and score_gcc_aarch64_toolchain - Add score_toolchains_rust 0.8.0 (Ferrocene Rust toolchain) - Add platforms + score_bazel_platforms dependencies - Upgrade score_docs_as_code to 2.0.3 (compat level 2, required by transitive score_process dependency) - Align rules_python, rules_rust, rules_cc, googletest, score_tooling, aspect_rules_lint, buildifier_prebuilt to the versions actually resolved by the dependency graph .bazelrc changes: - Add HTTP retry/timeout settings matching baselibs - Register GCC x86_64 + Ferrocene as common extra toolchains for host - Add _bl_stub config (baselibs flags: nlohmann JSON backend, use_typedshmd=False, warning features) - Add _bl_toolchain_common config (incompatible_strict_action_env, host_platform=x86_64-linux) - Add bl-x86_64-linux named config targeting score_bazel_platforms x86_64-linux-gcc_12.2.0-posix Build command: bazel build --config=bl-x86_64-linux //score/... Verified: 19 targets, 77 actions, Build completed successfully.

github-actions · 2026-06-24T12:06:05Z

License Check Results

🚀 The license check job ran with the Bazel command:

bazel run //:license-check

Status: ⚠️ Needs Review

Click to expand output

[License Check Output]
2026/07/07 06:49:00 Downloading https://releases.bazel.build/8.6.0/release/bazel-8.6.0-linux-x86_64...
Extracting Bazel installation...
Starting local Bazel server (8.6.0) and connecting to it...
INFO: Invocation ID: 3e68805c-568f-4dee-b3bb-2f8d810924f8
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Computing main repo mapping: 
Loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Loading: 0 packages loaded
    currently loading: 
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)
Analyzing: target //:license-check (1 packages loaded, 0 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (24 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (81 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (87 packages loaded, 10 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (138 packages loaded, 2607 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (157 packages loaded, 3855 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (163 packages loaded, 8132 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (163 packages loaded, 8133 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (163 packages loaded, 8133 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (163 packages loaded, 8133 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (163 packages loaded, 8133 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (167 packages loaded, 10142 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 10262 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 10262 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 10262 targets configured)

Analyzing: target //:license-check (168 packages loaded, 10262 targets configured)

INFO: Analyzed target //:license-check (169 packages loaded, 11841 targets configured).
[11 / 16] [Prepa] Expanding template external/score_tooling+/dash/tool/formatters/_dash_format_converter_stage2_bootstrap.py [for tool]
INFO: From Generating Dash formatted dependency file ...:
INFO: Successfully converted 2 packages from Cargo.lock to bazel-out/k8-fastbuild/bin/formatted.txt
[14 / 16] JavaToolchainCompileBootClasspath external/rules_java+/toolchains/platformclasspath.jar; 0s disk-cache, processwrapper-sandbox
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //:license.check.license_check up-to-date:
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check
  bazel-bin/license.check.license_check.jar
INFO: Elapsed time: 207.280s, Critical Path: 2.37s
INFO: 16 processes: 12 internal, 3 processwrapper-sandbox, 1 worker.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 16 total actions
INFO: Running command line: bazel-bin/license.check.license_check ./formatted.txt <args omitted>
usage: org.eclipse.dash.licenses.cli.Main [-batch <int>] [-cd <url>]
       [-confidence <int>] [-ef <url>] [-excludeSources <sources>] [-help] [-lic
       <url>] [-project <shortname>] [-repo <url>] [-review] [-summary <file>]
       [-timeout <seconds>] [-token <token>]

github-actions · 2026-06-24T12:06:47Z

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

- add pre-commit configuration and shared tools/run_tool.sh wrapper - import missing local link-check action from docs-as-code - fix gitlint workflow/action metadata for actionlint compatibility - refresh MODULE/MODULE.lock after tidy and extension resolution - apply auto-fixes produced by repository hooks (copyright/eof)

FScholPer · 2026-06-24T12:22:29Z

Pushed follow-up commit to make the branch pre-commit clean.

What was added/fixed:

Added
Added
Imported missing local action: from docs-as-code
Fixed gitlint workflow/action metadata for actionlint compatibility
Refreshed + after tidy/update
Included auto-fixes applied by hooks (copyright/eof)

FScholPer · 2026-06-24T12:22:37Z

Pushed follow-up commit c909c5f to make this branch pre-commit clean.

Add a minimal GitHub Actions workflow aligned with baselibs that builds the repository with --config=bl-x86_64-linux on PRs, main pushes, and merge groups.

FScholPer · 2026-06-24T12:35:12Z

Added a basic Linux build workflow in this PR:

.github/workflows/build_linux.yml

It is aligned with baselibs style and now compiles the project in CI using:

bazel build --config=bl-x86_64-linux -- //score/... //src/... //tests/...

Triggers:

pull_request (opened/reopened/synchronize)
push to main
merge_group
workflow_dispatch

I also ran actionlint locally for this workflow and it passes.

Include //score/... only when score/ contains Bazel packages, so CI works both before and after migration to baselibs-like source layout.

stmuench · 2026-06-25T07:30:47Z

+# FIXME: To be removed after https://github.com/eclipse-score/baselibs/issues/266 is resolved
+single_version_override(
+    module_name = "grpc-java",
+    version = "1.70.0",
+)


do we really need that in the inc_diagnostics repo?

Yes because this is still a problem coming from baselibs that it expect this in that version

sagovic · 2026-06-29T09:59:40Z

@FScholPer the repository is based on this template https://github.com/eclipse-score/module_template
Meanwhile the structure changed and my integration eclipse-opensovd/opensovd#108 proposal is based on the latest template version..

Does it make sense to sync so we do not diverge too much?

@RolandJentschETAS what is your opinion on re-syncing.

FScholPer · 2026-07-01T07:21:16Z

@FScholPer the repository is based on this template https://github.com/eclipse-score/module_template Meanwhile the structure changed and my integration eclipse-opensovd/opensovd#108 proposal is based on the latest template version..

Does it make sense to sync so we do not diverge too much?

@RolandJentschETAS what is your opinion on re-syncing.

I can add the automatic synching via bot or we do it manually. Whats your opinion?

Updated the daily maintenance workflow to streamline permissions and job structure. Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

lh-sag · 2026-07-01T07:53:32Z

@FScholPer the repository is based on this template https://github.com/eclipse-score/module_template Meanwhile the structure changed and my integration eclipse-opensovd/opensovd#108 proposal is based on the latest template version..
Does it make sense to sync so we do not diverge too much?
@RolandJentschETAS what is your opinion on re-syncing.

I can add the automatic synching via bot or we do it manually. Whats your opinion?

We might need both:

A manual sync - just once
Automatic sync via the bot in the future if we find it useful

The bot was introduced after the repository was created and maybe we need the manual sync first

FScholPer · 2026-07-01T08:04:37Z

@FScholPer the repository is based on this template https://github.com/eclipse-score/module_template Meanwhile the structure changed and my integration eclipse-opensovd/opensovd#108 proposal is based on the latest template version..
Does it make sense to sync so we do not diverge too much?
@RolandJentschETAS what is your opinion on re-syncing.

I can add the automatic synching via bot or we do it manually. Whats your opinion?

We might need both:

A manual sync - just once

Automatic sync via the bot in the future if we find it useful

The bot was introduced after the repository was created and maybe we need the manual sync first

We can directly use https://github.com/eclipse-score/cicd-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/template-sync.yml if we want. But many of the repos do not sync at all or rely on the template. There are other proposals in discussion like:

-> https://chatgpt.com/share/6a399423-a560-83ed-ae15-435f68b5b3ca

lh-sag · 2026-07-01T08:47:52Z

@FScholPer the repository is based on this template https://github.com/eclipse-score/module_template Meanwhile the structure changed and my integration eclipse-opensovd/opensovd#108 proposal is based on the latest template version..
Does it make sense to sync so we do not diverge too much?
@RolandJentschETAS what is your opinion on re-syncing.

I can add the automatic synching via bot or we do it manually. Whats your opinion?

We might need both:

A manual sync - just once

Automatic sync via the bot in the future if we find it useful

The bot was introduced after the repository was created and maybe we need the manual sync first

We can directly use https://github.com/eclipse-score/cicd-workflows/blob/main/.github/workflows/template-sync.yml if we want. But many of the repos do not sync at all or rely on the template. There are other proposals in discussion like:

-> https://chatgpt.com/share/6a399423-a560-83ed-ae15-435f68b5b3ca

How about having an initial sync (by whatever mean) and postpone the question about continuously keeping it in sync in the future.
Right now the repo is quite off from the template.

Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

FScholPer · 2026-07-03T09:38:45Z

@nradakovic @stmuench @lh-sag @MonikaKumari26 @antonkri please check again if it fits now

stmuench · 2026-07-06T06:47:40Z

@FScholPer I request @nradakovic to have a look once more

Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

FScholPer mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2026

score/mw/diag: Add C++ API for DID & RoutineControl #4

Open

add devcontainer

5cd5df7

FScholPer requested a review from antonkri June 24, 2026 12:30

ci: add basic linux build workflow

25e3413

Add a minimal GitHub Actions workflow aligned with baselibs that builds the repository with --config=bl-x86_64-linux on PRs, main pushes, and merge groups.

ci: make linux build workflow score-layout aware

2b9c2cc

Include //score/... only when score/ contains Bazel packages, so CI works both before and after migration to baselibs-like source layout.

stmuench reviewed Jun 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

nradakovic requested changes Jun 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .bazelrc Outdated

Comment thread tests/cpp/test_main.cpp Outdated

FScholPer added 6 commits June 25, 2026 10:59

fix formatting / copyright

dd55c5d

fixed review comment

f03c80a

removed deprecated workflows

5bcf523

Fix copyright

d045445

add devcontainer to bazel

15a4c41

Fix build

7aaac6b

MonikaKumari26 reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .github/workflows/build_linux.yml

MonikaKumari26 reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .github/workflows/build_linux.yml

MonikaKumari26 reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .bazelrc

MonikaKumari26 reviewed Jun 30, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .github/workflows/daily.yml Outdated

Refactor daily maintenance workflow

e64f6ce

Updated the daily maintenance workflow to streamline permissions and job structure. Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

FScholPer added 5 commits July 1, 2026 08:59

fix comments

22a9d73

chore: sync with module_template

6c5e098

build: add bl-x86_64-linux config for Bazel builds

352fad4

chore: remove accidentally committed generated SVG

de1633f

chore: fix pre-commit and reuse compliance

595ace3

stmuench reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread score/mw/diag/design/diag_api_rust.svg Outdated

stmuench reviewed Jul 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread BUILD Outdated

FScholPer and others added 2 commits July 3, 2026 11:11

Remove blank line in BUILD file

91d3f9c

Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

build: add score_devcontainer for pre-commit tool wrappers

e9ad15b

nradakovic reviewed Jul 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread .bazelrc Outdated

Remove redundant CPU option from .bazelrc

83906f6

Signed-off-by: Frank Scholter Peres(MBTI) <145544737+FScholPer@users.noreply.github.com>

nradakovic self-requested a review July 7, 2026 07:45

nradakovic approved these changes Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

FScholPer merged commit 060047f into main Jul 7, 2026
9 checks passed

FScholPer deleted the fix/adopt-baselibs-toolchain-settings branch July 7, 2026 08:55

Uh oh!

Conversation

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Changes

MODULE.bazel

.bazelrc

Verified

Related

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

License Check Results

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

stmuench Jun 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

FScholPer Jun 25, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sagovic commented Jun 29, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

lh-sag commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

lh-sag commented Jul 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

FScholPer commented Jul 3, 2026

Uh oh!

stmuench commented Jul 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

`MODULE.bazel`

`.bazelrc`

github-actions Bot commented Jun 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

FScholPer commented Jun 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading