make it more obvious that this is about local functions #51170
Conversation
... by sorrounding the fibonacci function/lambda with a proper method. ... also, unified spacing around operators
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
dotnet-fundamentals/svc
community-contribution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR improves the code examples for IDE0039 rule by wrapping the fibonacci function/lambda examples within proper method contexts to make it clearer that the rule is about local functions versus lambdas. The changes also unify spacing around operators for consistency.
Changes:
- Added enclosing
CalcFib5()method wrapper to both code examples - Unified operator spacing (consistent spaces around
-and+operators) - Added a
return fibonacci(5);call to demonstrate the usage - Added "vs." comment separator between the two examples
| ```csharp | ||
| // csharp_style_prefer_local_over_anonymous_function = true | ||
| int fibonacci(int n) | ||
| int CalcFib5() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method name should use PascalCase according to .NET naming conventions. Consider renaming to "CalculateFib5" or "GetFibonacci5" to follow standard .NET naming conventions for public methods.
| Func<int, int> fibonacci = (int n) => | ||
| // vs. | ||
| int CalcFib5() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The method name should use PascalCase according to .NET naming conventions. Consider renaming to "CalculateFib5" or "GetFibonacci5" to follow standard .NET naming conventions for public methods.
1 participant
... by sorrounding the fibonacci function/lambda with a proper method.
... also, unified spacing around operators
Summary
Describe your changes here.
Fixes #Issue_Number (if available)