Skip to content

Add correlated lookup tests#673

Open
PatersonProjects wants to merge 6 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
PatersonProjects:correlated_lookup_tests
Open

Add correlated lookup tests#673
PatersonProjects wants to merge 6 commits into
documentdb:mainfrom
PatersonProjects:correlated_lookup_tests

Conversation

@PatersonProjects

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds additional tests to the lookup operator so as to test stage-specific coverage, $let with various operators, and edge and error cases

Ref: Issue #34

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
…-tests

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
…-tests

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
…ses, removed out of scope cases

Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects requested a review from a team as a code owner July 9, 2026 20:49
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2026 21:04
Signed-off-by: PatersonProjects <keldonhoff@gmail.com>
@PatersonProjects PatersonProjects marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2026 21:39
@documentdb-triage-tool documentdb-triage-tool Bot added compatibility test Compatibility test related enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 9, 2026
@documentdb-triage-tool

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Auto-triaged by documentdb-triage-tool.

Applied: compatibility test, enhancement
Project fields suggested: Component test-coverage · Priority P2 · Effort XL · Status Needs Review
Confidence: 0.82 (mixed)

Reasoning

component from path globs (test-coverage); effort from diff stats (4560+59 LOC, 10 files); LLM: Adds new test cases for the lookup operator covering stage-specific scenarios, $let operators, and edge/error cases, expanding test coverage without modifying core functionality.

If a label is wrong, remove it manually and ping @patty-chow so the rules can be tuned. The bot will not re-label items that already have component labels.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compatibility test Compatibility test related enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant