Skip to content

Tracer Docs#2018

Open
HeshamHM28 wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
docs/tracer/java
Open

Tracer Docs#2018
HeshamHM28 wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
docs/tracer/java

Conversation

@HeshamHM28
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@HeshamHM28 HeshamHM28 requested a review from mashraf-222 April 7, 2026 12:51
mashraf-222 and others added 5 commits April 8, 2026 23:30
Take -cp first ordering from #2019, remove --app-args and mvn exec:java,
keep #2018's additions (Maven/Gradle test suites, multi-module, trace-only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The recursive implementation was replaced with an iterative fast-doubling algorithm that computes Fibonacci(n) in O(log n) time by processing the bits of n and applying matrix-exponentiation doubling formulas (F(2k) = F(k)*(2*F(k+1) - F(k)) and F(2k+1) = F(k+1)² + F(k)²), eliminating the exponential O(2^n) recursive call tree that dominated original runtime at 32.5% per the profiler. This cuts execution time from 3.81 ms to 179 µs (20× speedup) by avoiding redundant subproblem recomputation and deep call stacks. The optimization incurs no regressions in correctness, maintains identical exception behavior, and scales to larger n values that would timeout under naive recursion.
The optimization replaced the naive recursive `fibonacci(i)` call inside the loop (which recomputed overlapping subproblems exponentially) with an iterative approach that builds the sequence in a single forward pass, reusing `result[i-1]` and `result[i-2]`. The original profiler shows `result[i] = fibonacci(i)` consumed 94% of runtime at ~37 µs per call due to exponential tree traversal; the optimized version computes each element in constant time by direct addition. Runtime improved 27% (230 µs → 181 µs) with no correctness regressions across all test cases.
…ci.fibonacciSequence-mnqqzpp4

⚡️ Speed up method `Fibonacci.fibonacciSequence` by 27%
…ci.fibonacci-mnqq81k5

⚡️ Speed up method `Fibonacci.fibonacci` by 2,036%
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants