Skip to content

chore: update date + context to match email#2605

Merged
claudiacodacy merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
github-updates-review
Mar 3, 2026
Merged

chore: update date + context to match email#2605
claudiacodacy merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
github-updates-review

Conversation

@claudiacodacy
Copy link
Contributor

👀 Live preview

🚧 To do

  • If relevant, include the Jira issue key at the end of the pull request title
  • Perform a self-review of the changes
  • Fix any issues reported by the CI/CD

@claudiacodacy claudiacodacy requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 13:47
@claudiacodacy claudiacodacy requested a review from mark-rln March 3, 2026 13:47
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Overall readability score: 54.11 (🟢 +0)

File Readability
cloud-2026-03-github-integration-settings-changes.md 51.25 (🟢 +0.94)
View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability
🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
cloud-2026-03-github-integration-settings-changes.md 51.25 28.84 10.74 13.2 13.51 7.33
  🟢 +0.94 🔴 -0.1 🟢 +0.11 🟢 +0.3 🟢 +0.35 🔴 -0.05

Averages:

  Readability FRE GF ARI CLI DCRS
Average 54.11 42.92 10.94 12.33 12.23 8.01
  🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0 🟢 +0
View metric targets
Metric Range Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease 100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read) 60
Gunning Fog 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Auto. Read. Index 6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Coleman Liau Index 6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read) 8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability 4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read) 6.9 or less

@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to Netlify March 3, 2026 13:48 Inactive
@codacy-production
Copy link
Contributor

codacy-production bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 0 minor issue)
0 new security issue
More details

AI Reviewer: run a review on demand. To trigger the first review automatically, go to your organization or repository integration settings. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Open report

TIP This review will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback

Copy link
Contributor

@mark-rln mark-rln left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@claudiacodacy claudiacodacy merged commit f59299b into master Mar 3, 2026
5 checks passed
@claudiacodacy claudiacodacy deleted the github-updates-review branch March 3, 2026 14:21
Copy link
Contributor

@codacy-production codacy-production bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

The pull request successfully updates the release notes to reflect the new migration date (March 17, 2026) and adds helpful context about the AI Reviewer. However, there is an inconsistency in the documentation anchor links used for the AI Reviewer, and the PR description lacks project-specific context.

About this PR

  • The pull request description is currently empty and contains only the default template instructions. Please provide a brief summary of the changes and why they were made to help reviewers understand the context.

🗒️ Improve review quality by adding custom instructions

Comment on lines +17 to +19
Codacy is deprecating the AI-enhanced comments (Beta) feature in favour of the [AI Reviewer](../../codacy-ai/codacy-ai.md#ai-reviewer), which provides a more accurate, comprehensive, and context-aware experience for identifying and addressing issues.

On March 17, 2026, Codacy will migrate all repositories and organizations that have **AI-enhanced comments** enabled to the [AI Reviewer](../../codacy-ai/codacy-ai.md#ai-reviewer) and remove the setting.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚪ LOW RISK

The links to the AI Reviewer documentation are inconsistent. Lines 17 and 19 use the anchor #ai-reviewer, while lines 12, 41, and the file footer use #pr-reviewer.

This might be a simple fix:

Suggested change
Codacy is deprecating the AI-enhanced comments (Beta) feature in favour of the [AI Reviewer](../../codacy-ai/codacy-ai.md#ai-reviewer), which provides a more accurate, comprehensive, and context-aware experience for identifying and addressing issues.
On March 17, 2026, Codacy will migrate all repositories and organizations that have **AI-enhanced comments** enabled to the [AI Reviewer](../../codacy-ai/codacy-ai.md#ai-reviewer) and remove the setting.
Codacy is deprecating the AI-enhanced comments (Beta) feature in favour of the [AI Reviewer](../../codacy-ai/codacy-ai.md#pr-reviewer), which provides a more accurate, comprehensive, and context-aware experience for identifying and addressing issues.

@claudiacodacy
Copy link
Contributor Author

claudiacodacy commented Mar 4, 2026

Codacy's Analysis Summary

0 new issue (≤ 1 medium issue)
0 new security issue (≤ 0 issue)
0 complexity
0 duplications
+0.00% coverage variation (-0.50%)
33.33% diff coverage (50.00%)
More details

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (9c6dcab570c3a7a1081f88975ff1f93ae6cd5314) 1646 910 55.29%
Head commit (0ae5ca6bd03c95f4dfa5f28976a3b27f892a47c5) 1646 (+0) 910 (+0) 55.29% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#160) 3 1 33.33%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

AI Reviewer: run a review on demand. To trigger the first review automatically, go to your organization or repository integration settings. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

Open report

TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes. Give us feedback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants