Add "RBD" section to architecture.md#13
Conversation
Add a section explaining RBD at a high-level for neophytes to Ceph. Signed-off-by: Zac Dover <zac.dover@proton.me>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new "Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)" section to the Ceph architecture documentation describing RBD purpose, design traits, client connectivity options, performance/scalability, virtualization/cloud integration, and RADOS features. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
⚔️ Resolve merge conflicts
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/architecture/ceph.md (1)
15-17: Consider adjusting the heading hierarchy or adding introductory content.The "Architecture" heading (line 15) appears empty, immediately followed by "Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)" at the same heading level. This creates ambiguity about whether RBD is a subsection of Architecture or a sibling section.
Consider either:
- Making RBD a subsection with
### Ceph Block Device (RBD), or- Adding introductory content under "Architecture" that explains what will be covered
Also, since this section is quite comprehensive (120+ lines), consider dropping "Summary" from the title to avoid misleading readers about the depth of coverage.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/architecture/ceph.md` around lines 15 - 17, The "Architecture" header is empty and followed by "Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)", which creates a hierarchy ambiguity: either convert "Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)" into a subsection (e.g., change "## Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)" to "### Ceph Block Device (RBD)") or add a brief introductory paragraph under the top-level "## Architecture" explaining the document scope and listing subsections; also remove "Summary" from the RBD heading to reflect the in-depth content (rename to "Ceph Block Device (RBD)") for clarity.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/architecture/ceph.md`:
- Around line 44-57: The paragraph under the "Performance and Scalability"
section incorrectly expands the acronym "KVM" as "Key-Value Machines (KVMs)";
update the text to read "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)" or simply "KVM" and
adjust the surrounding sentence referencing "Key-Value Machines (KVMs) such as
QEMU" to correctly say "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) such as QEMU" or "KVM
(Kernel-based Virtual Machine) such as QEMU" so the term is factually accurate
and consistent with the existing mention of libvirt and QEMU.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/architecture/ceph.md`:
- Around line 15-17: The "Architecture" header is empty and followed by "Ceph
Block Device Summary (RBD)", which creates a hierarchy ambiguity: either convert
"Ceph Block Device Summary (RBD)" into a subsection (e.g., change "## Ceph Block
Device Summary (RBD)" to "### Ceph Block Device (RBD)") or add a brief
introductory paragraph under the top-level "## Architecture" explaining the
document scope and listing subsections; also remove "Summary" from the RBD
heading to reflect the in-depth content (rename to "Ceph Block Device (RBD)")
for clarity.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
zdover23
force-pushed
the
docs-2026-03-26-architecture-rbd
branch
from
6b7abdf to
f977c63
Compare
2 participants
Add a section explaining RBD at a high-level for neophytes to Ceph.
Summary by CodeRabbit