Skip to content

Update declared license for maven:svm 24.1.1#31730

Merged
capfei merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
clearlydefinedbot_251220_052441.924
Jan 8, 2026
Merged

Update declared license for maven:svm 24.1.1#31730
capfei merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
clearlydefinedbot_251220_052441.924

Conversation

@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Type: Missing

Summary:
Update declared license for maven:svm 24.1.1

Details:
The declared license for this component is GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0.

Resolution:
License Url: https://github.com/oracle/graal

Evidence: Public metadata or canonical license location indicates the declared license.

Pull request generated by Microsoft tooling and AI discovery.

Affected definitions:

@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the merge conflict GitHub Action bot will auto add/remove this label when there's a conflict. label Jan 6, 2026
@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

21.3.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
22.0.0.2 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
24.1.1 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

1 similar comment
@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

21.3.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
22.0.0.2 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
24.1.1 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jan 8, 2026

@capfei
Conflicts have been resolved. 👍

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the merge conflict GitHub Action bot will auto add/remove this label when there's a conflict. label Jan 8, 2026
@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

19.3.6 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
20.0.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
21.3.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
22.0.0.2 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
24.1.1 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

@capfei capfei merged commit 1aa1333 into master Jan 8, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
@capfei capfei deleted the clearlydefinedbot_251220_052441.924 branch January 8, 2026 23:20
@clearlydefinedbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We discovered some errors in this curation when validating it:

19.3.6 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
20.0.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
21.3.0 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
22.0.0.2 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant
24.1.1 licensed.declared with value "GPL-2.0-only WITH LicenseRef-scancode-oracle-openjdk-exception-2.0" is not SPDX compliant

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants