Skip to content

Add slicewise — dual-model review + reconcile feature-dev loop (Code Quality Testing)#312

Open
pjw81226 wants to merge 1 commit into
ccplugins:mainfrom
pjw81226:add-slicewise-plugin
Open

Add slicewise — dual-model review + reconcile feature-dev loop (Code Quality Testing)#312
pjw81226 wants to merge 1 commit into
ccplugins:mainfrom
pjw81226:add-slicewise-plugin

Conversation

@pjw81226

@pjw81226 pjw81226 commented Jul 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds slicewise to the Code Quality Testing category.

slicewise is a disciplined, self-verifying feature-development loop delivered as a Claude Code plugin. For every commit unit it runs a build/test gate, then dispatches two independent reviewers in parallel and reconciles their findings before handing the commit off to the human to land — no auto-commit. It's stack-agnostic (auto-detects npm / cargo / go / gradle / pytest / make) and needs zero config to start.

Original repo: https://github.com/pjw81226/slicewise

Changes

  • Vendored plugin source under plugins/slicewise/ (slash command + skill + reviewer agent + plugin.json)
  • Registered in .claude-plugin/marketplace.json under Code Quality Testing
  • Listed in README.md under Code Quality Testing (alphabetical)

Integrity checks

  • marketplace.json parses cleanly; entry count 118 → 119, no duplicate name
  • source path ./plugins/slicewise exists on disk with a valid .claude-plugin/plugin.json
  • category matches an existing marketplace category and README section

A disciplined, self-verifying feature-dev loop for Claude Code: every commit
unit gets dual-model review + a reconcile pass, tests are the ground truth,
and the human decides what lands (no auto-commit). Stack-agnostic via config
plus auto-detect.

- Vendored plugin source under plugins/slicewise/
- Registered in .claude-plugin/marketplace.json (Code Quality Testing)
- Listed in README.md under Code Quality Testing
@pjw81226 pjw81226 force-pushed the add-slicewise-plugin branch from d09883e to d3a400d Compare July 15, 2026 02:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant