-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: replace getinstancesbybusinesskey with a general getinstances method #106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Kronprinz03
wants to merge
14
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
105-feat-replace-getinstancesbybusinesskey-with-a-general-getinstances-method
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8c3b6a8
updated the csnBUilder and reimported test-processes
Kronprinz03 de3e4a1
Changed the services acording to the new getInstace inputs
Kronprinz03 b858474
changed processService acording to new getInstace function
Kronprinz03 d9e1b89
changed the api requests
Kronprinz03 25efdcf
fixed existing tests
Kronprinz03 9259934
added new tests
Kronprinz03 951c148
added changelog and readme
Kronprinz03 c0f1ebb
PR-Review fixes
Kronprinz03 3cd706a
fix lint
Kronprinz03 26d6c13
Merge branch 'main' into 105-feat-replace-getinstancesbybusinesskey-w…
SirSimon04 5522a09
fixed the input for the tests
Kronprinz03 51b93fe
renaming filtered to filteredInstances
Kronprinz03 3227070
added a test to verify behavior when no params are given to getInstances
Kronprinz03 5c94ee6
nächstes mal machst das selber ;)
SirSimon04 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if we should 1:1 mirror the wfApi here, I think it makes it more complicated to include those orderBy / top / skip / inlinecount
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean we try to mirror the sbpa workflow api as much as possible, if you think they are to noise I can remove orderBy and inlinecount since they are sbpa specific
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would remove them at least as they, from my POV dont bring any benefit