-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
feat(tel): implement otel sink #1888
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Hweinstock
wants to merge
14
commits into
aws:refactor
Choose a base branch
from
Hweinstock:feat/otel-sink
base: refactor
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e2862d4
feat(tel): implement otel sink
14a2603
docs(tel): add docstring comments to otel sink
42bc9df
test(tel): add a test of a local server for the collector sink
4b537a7
chore: merge in refactor-main changes
da70cbb
chore: remove extra space from telemetry test file
ead49c9
docs: add note in comment about default value
367dee5
fix(tel): avoid letting flush failures stop shutdown
13e745a
feat(tel): swap to cli from error method
b7d1947
Merge branch 'refactor-main' into feat/otel-sink
53b705b
Merge branch 'refactor-main' into feat/otel-sink
863c664
Merge branch 'refactor-main' into feat/otel-sink
799dde6
fix(tel): remove duplicate resource attributes
7e9a97e
feat(tel): add installationId header and temporarily preference
6806436
test(tel): adjust test to use passed down resource attributes
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems like a wrong/malformed endpoint makes
getMetricSinks()reject, andshutdown()propagates that rejection, erroring out in the CLI command. Is that understanding correct? can we make it best-effort?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we (the dev team) should be the only ones modifying the endpoint for testing purposes. In which case, I think the ideal behavior is that we reject early.
If a user decides to go into the global config and add an invalid override, I think rejecting is reasonable.