Fix wildcard let bindings and add body-less let syntax#351
Merged
arthurpaulino merged 1 commit intomainfrom Mar 27, 2026
Merged
Fix wildcard let bindings and add body-less let syntax#351arthurpaulino merged 1 commit intomainfrom
arthurpaulino merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
- Simplifier no longer drops wildcard let expressions, preserving side effects (constraints, assertions, IO) in circuit code - Compiler handles wildcard let patterns in both toIndex and compile - Add `let pat = trm;` and `let pat = trm` syntax forms that implicitly use `()` as the continuation body - Update call sites to use `let _ =` instead of `let _x =`
gabriel-barrett
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
let pat = trm;andlet pat = trmsyntax forms that implicitly use()as the continuation bodylet _ =instead oflet _x =