Skip to content

Add sites migration details to docs#2781

Open
atharvadeosthale wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
sites-migration
Open

Add sites migration details to docs#2781
atharvadeosthale wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
sites-migration

Conversation

@atharvadeosthale
Copy link
Member

@atharvadeosthale atharvadeosthale commented Mar 3, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new "Sites" column to the Migrations source table and renamed "Documents" to "Rows"; per-row entries updated (placeholder "-" for some platforms, "enabled" for Cloud and Self-hosted).
    • Expanded selectable data types in cloud and self-hosted migration steps to include "sites" alongside existing options.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 3, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4a19408 and 75f4f7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/+page.markdoc
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/+page.markdoc

Walkthrough

Updated three Markdoc documentation pages related to migrations to add "sites" as a selectable data type. Two pages (cloud and self-hosted) insert "sites" into a list of data selection options. One page modifies a reference table: the "Documents" column is renamed to "Rows", a new "Sites" column is added, and per-row values are adjusted (Cloud and Self hosted show "enabled"; Firebase, Supabase, and Nhost show "-" under Sites). All changes are documentation-only.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title 'Add sites migration details to docs' directly and clearly summarizes the main change: adding documentation about sites migration across three documentation files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch sites-migration

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/`+page.markdoc:
- Line 15: Replace the legacy term "Documents" with "Rows" in the table header
string "| Source | Users | Databases | Documents | Files | Functions | Sites |"
so it reads "| Source | Users | Databases | Rows | Files | Functions | Sites |";
update any identical header occurrences in this .markdoc to use "Rows"
(consistent with the project's rows/columns terminology).

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41f211d and 4a19408.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/+page.markdoc
  • src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/cloud/+page.markdoc
  • src/routes/docs/advanced/migrations/self-hosted/+page.markdoc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant