Skip to content

chore(deps, pyamber): update dependency sqlalchemy to v2.0.52 - #7708

Open
renovate-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:mainfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/pyamber-patch-updates
Open

chore(deps, pyamber): update dependency sqlalchemy to v2.0.52#7708
renovate-bot wants to merge 2 commits into
apache:mainfrom
renovate-bot:renovate/pyamber-patch-updates

Conversation

@renovate-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
SQLAlchemy (changelog) ==2.0.51==2.0.52 age confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (in timezone Etc/UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "before 8am on monday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@forking-renovate forking-renovate Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 17, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Automated Reviewer Suggestions

Based on the git blame history of the changed files, we recommend the following reviewers:

  • Contributors with relevant context: @xuang7
    You can notify them by mentioning @xuang7 in a comment.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.93%. Comparing base (7a2c8d0) to head (c66b6cb).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #7708      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     90.94%   90.93%   -0.01%     
  Complexity     4452     4452              
============================================
  Files          1175     1175              
  Lines         47140    47140              
  Branches       5284     5284              
============================================
- Hits          42870    42868       -2     
- Misses         2580     2582       +2     
  Partials       1690     1690              
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
access-control-service 81.00% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
agent-service 98.62% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
amber 87.40% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
computing-unit-managing-service 73.67% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
config-service 86.73% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
file-service 68.90% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
frontend 92.44% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
notebook-migration-service 83.74% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0
pyamber 97.52% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
workflow-compiling-service 77.19% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 7a2c8d0

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

renovate-bot and others added 2 commits August 16, 2026 21:25
The direct-dep drift check blocks CI until amber/LICENSE-binary-python
claims the bundled version. SQLAlchemy stays MIT, so only the version
bullet moves.
@aglinxinyuan
aglinxinyuan force-pushed the renovate/pyamber-patch-updates branch from c502952 to c66b6cb Compare August 17, 2026 05:28
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ No material benchmark regressions detected

🟢 5 better · 🔴 0 worse · ⚪ 10 noise (<±5%) · 0 without baseline

Compared against main 1011ff7 benchmarked on this same runner, so the delta is largely free of cross-runner hardware noise. The "7d avg" column still reflects the gh-pages dashboard. Treat <±5% as noise unless repeated.

Dashboard · Run

config throughput MB/s latency max Δ latest / 7d
🟢 bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 528 0.322 17,581/25,946/25,946 us 🟢 -6.1% / 🔴 +60.5%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 1,182 0.721 82,395/120,485/120,485 us ⚪ within ±5% / 🟢 -16.9%
🟢 bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 1,423 0.869 704,735/739,548/739,548 us 🟢 -7.8% / 🟢 +34.7%
Baseline details

Latest main 1011ff7 from same runner

config metric PR latest main 7d avg Δ latest Δ 7d
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 528 tuples/sec 526 tuples/sec 784.16 tuples/sec +0.4% -32.7%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.322 MB/s 0.321 MB/s 0.479 MB/s +0.3% -32.7%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p50 17,581 us 18,720 us 12,626 us -6.1% +39.2%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p95 25,946 us 27,345 us 16,169 us -5.1% +60.5%
bs=10 sw=10 sl=64 p99 25,946 us 27,345 us 18,986 us -5.1% +36.7%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 1,182 tuples/sec 1,201 tuples/sec 1,023 tuples/sec -1.6% +15.5%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.721 MB/s 0.733 MB/s 0.625 MB/s -1.6% +15.4%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p50 82,395 us 79,532 us 99,185 us +3.6% -16.9%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p95 120,485 us 116,699 us 105,616 us +3.2% +14.1%
bs=100 sw=10 sl=64 p99 120,485 us 116,699 us 113,681 us +3.2% +6.0%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 throughput 1,423 tuples/sec 1,423 tuples/sec 1,057 tuples/sec 0.0% +34.7%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 MB/s 0.869 MB/s 0.869 MB/s 0.645 MB/s 0.0% +34.7%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p50 704,735 us 703,551 us 965,435 us +0.2% -27.0%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p95 739,548 us 802,377 us 1,012,135 us -7.8% -26.9%
bs=1000 sw=10 sl=64 p99 739,548 us 802,377 us 1,042,088 us -7.8% -29.0%
Raw CSV
config_idx,batch_size,schema_width,string_len,num_batches,total_ms,total_tuples,total_bytes,tuples_per_sec,mb_per_sec,lat_p50_us,lat_p95_us,lat_p99_us
0,10,10,64,20,378.87,200,128000,528,0.322,17581.37,25945.81,25945.81
1,100,10,64,20,1691.90,2000,1280000,1182,0.721,82394.57,120485.35,120485.35
2,1000,10,64,20,14052.04,20000,12800000,1423,0.869,704735.27,739547.95,739547.95

@forking-renovate

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@aglinxinyuan
aglinxinyuan requested a review from mengw15 August 17, 2026 06:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file pyamber

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants