chore(ci): Support Python 3.13#4088
Conversation
|
There are some dependency to be cleared. |
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Move dependency `transformer` from `requirements.txt` to `operator-requirements.txt`. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? The dependency were introduced #2600 for supporting hugging face operators. It should not have been a dependency for pyamber, but the specific operator. - #2600 This blocks #4088 ### How was this PR tested? Existing tests. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No
|
waiting for #4091 |
|
blocked by pyiceberg, related issue: apache/iceberg-python#2536 |
|
I want to confirm with @aglinxinyuan. Do you think we can merge this, or do you think we need a vote first? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don’t need a separate vote, since the PR review process already serves as one.
An email is only necessary when soliciting votes on procedural issues or a release, to ensure the majority is aware that a vote is taking place.
For code modifications, the Apache requirement is three +1 votes and no -1 votes for approval. This is why many projects require at least two approving reviews on a PR—combined with the author’s implicit +1, this satisfies the three-vote threshold.
|
sg. Merging now. |
### What changes were proposed in this PR? Move dependency `transformer` from `requirements.txt` to `operator-requirements.txt`. ### Any related issues, documentation, discussions? The dependency were introduced apache#2600 for supporting hugging face operators. It should not have been a dependency for pyamber, but the specific operator. - apache#2600 This blocks apache#4088 ### How was this PR tested? Existing tests. ### Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No
What changes were proposed in this PR?
Officially add support for Python 3.13 in Python UDF and native operators.
Any related issues, documentation, discussions?
resolves #4079
How was this PR tested?
New CI.
Was this PR authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No