Skip to content

KAFKA-20502: Add IQv2 isolation-level integration tests - #23077

Open
nicktelford wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
nicktelford:KIP-892/iq-isolation-integration-iqv2
Open

KAFKA-20502: Add IQv2 isolation-level integration tests#23077
nicktelford wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:trunkfrom
nicktelford:KIP-892/iq-isolation-integration-iqv2

Conversation

@nicktelford

@nicktelford nicktelford commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

KIP-892 adds interactive-query isolation levels. The support spans many
store implementations and, for IQv2, all query runners. Until now, only
unit tests covered this behavior.

This change adds the IQv2 counterpart to the IQv1 isolation-level
integration tests from KAFKA-20501. It proves that a READ_COMMITTED
query sees only committed records, and a READ_UNCOMMITTED query sees
uncommitted writes, across all store shapes and query runners. The tests
reuse the shared IsolationLevelIntegrationFixtures harness added by
KAFKA-20501.

The interactive-query isolation-level support added under KIP-892 spans
many store implementations and, for IQv2, all query runners — but has
so far only been covered by unit tests. This adds the IQv2 counterpart
to the IQv1 isolation-level integration tests (KAFKA-20501), proving
that a READ_COMMITTED query observes only committed records while a
READ_UNCOMMITTED query sees uncommitted writes, across all store
shapes and query runners. Reuses the shared
IsolationLevelIntegrationFixtures harness added by KAFKA-20501.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added triage PRs from the community streams tests Test fixes (including flaky tests) labels Aug 4, 2026
@nicktelford

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bbejeck

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

streams tests Test fixes (including flaky tests) triage PRs from the community

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant