feat: Add script to build and push Docker images

[deepakpanda93]

Describe the issue this Pull Request addresses

This PR introduces a script to streamline the process of building and pushing Docker images.

Summary and Changelog

This PR adds shell scripts that:

• Builds a Docker image using a specified Dockerfile.
• Pushes the tagged image(s) to a specified Docker registry.

Impact

None

Risk Level

none

Documentation Update

Script includes inline comments and usage help. No updates needed on the Hudi website.

Contributor's checklist

• Read through contributor's guide
• Enough context is provided in the sections above
• Adequate tests were added if applicable

[hudi-bot]

CI report:

• 11e074b Azure: SUCCESS

Bot commands

@hudi-bot supports the following commands:

• @hudi-bot run azure re-run the last Azure build

[xushiyan]

add more descriptions here, describe what this script does, and who should use it (as in pushing is for hudi maintainers, not every users)

[xushiyan]

Suggested change

	# ./build_and_push_docker_images.sh true # build and push
	# ./build_and_push_docker_images.sh --publish true # build and publish

rename to call it publish? and use named arg to be explicit

[yihua]

@deepakpanda93 could you address the comments?

[deepakpanda93]

Closing in favour of #19489.

docker/build_docker_images.sh was substantially rewritten on master after this PR was opened, and this PR replaces that file with a copy forked from the older version. Rebasing would therefore have reverted the named version flags, the pom.xml-derived version tag, the Java 11/17 base selection and the multi-arch support that landed since. #19489 is a fresh port of the same idea onto the current script instead.

Both review comments here are addressed there:

• merged into a single script rather than a second one, with --publish <true|false> defaulting to false
• the header describes what the script does and that publishing is for maintainers, reachable via --help
• the flag is named --publish and takes an explicit value, as suggested

Thanks @xushiyan for the review, and @yihua for the nudge.