Skip to content

branch-4.0: [fix](fe) Fix colocate replica allocation edit log #65457#65528

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-65457-branch-4.0
Open

branch-4.0: [fix](fe) Fix colocate replica allocation edit log #65457#65528
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
branch-4.0from
auto-pick-65457-branch-4.0

Conversation

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cherry-picked from #65457

Related PR: #49569

Problem Summary: Related PR #49569 changed the colocate replica
allocation helper boolean from needEditLog to isReplay, but kept the old
call-site values. As a result, normal ALTER COLOCATE GROUP replica
allocation changes were treated as replay and skipped
logColocateModifyRepliaAlloc, so the new replica allocation was not
persisted for follower replay or master failover. The replay path was
treated as a normal operation and could append another edit log while
loading journal entries. This patch flips the two call-site values:
leader ALTER uses isReplay = false and writes the edit log, while replay
uses isReplay = true and does not append a new edit log. It also adds FE
unit tests covering both behaviors.
@github-actions github-actions Bot requested a review from morningman as a code owner July 13, 2026 08:09
@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hello-stephen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants