Skip to content

ARTEMIS-5069 / ARTEMIS-5068 Temporary queues are going through mirroring#6301

Open
clebertsuconic wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
clebertsuconic:ARTEMIS-5069
Open

ARTEMIS-5069 / ARTEMIS-5068 Temporary queues are going through mirroring#6301
clebertsuconic wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
clebertsuconic:ARTEMIS-5069

Conversation

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor

Mirroring should ignore send / create / delete / acks for temporary queues

@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Notice the test I wrote here will most likely fail until #6300 is merged

@clebertsuconic clebertsuconic force-pushed the ARTEMIS-5069 branch 4 times, most recently from 1e19209 to 312febb Compare March 19, 2026 01:38
@gemmellr
Copy link
Member

The title and commit log message reference a non-existent Jira.

@clebertsuconic clebertsuconic changed the title ARTEMIS-5069 / ARTEMIS-5968 Temporary queues are going through mirroring ARTEMIS-5069 / ARTEMIS-5068 Temporary queues are going through mirroring Mar 19, 2026
@clebertsuconic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gemmellr nice catch on my typo... 9 is next to 0... I hit the wrong key by accident :)
that's a shame as I'm a keyboardist/piano player :)

Mirroring should ignore send / create / delete / acks for temporary
queues
}

@Test
public void testNoTemporaryQueues() throws Exception {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test is named testNoTemporaryQueues but its creating temporary topics. It would be nice to create a set of tests that exercise both to ensure the two domains are covered in testing for the mirror. Should be simple enough the create on method that does one type of the other and call it with an option.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it matters on this case... it's a temporary queue from the internal POV. but I will add the test

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants