i18n(zh-CN): add missing translations

[sjyangkevin]

Add missing Simplified Chinese (zh-CN) translations for the Airflow 3.3.0 RC.

breeze ui check-translation-completeness --language zh-CN

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes (please specify the tool below)

Generated-by: [Claude Code (Claude Sonnet 4.6)] following the guidelines

---

• Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
• For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
• When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
• For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

[Lee-W]

Find some usage that surprised me, but after some research, it seems to be right 👀

Welcome back Kevin :)

[sjyangkevin]

Find some usage that surprised me, but after some research, it seems to be right 👀

Welcome back Kevin :)

Thanks Wei! Interested in which usage is that. I am a bit unsure about "consumingAsset": "消费者资源", but it seems to be aligned with existing convention.

[Lee-W]

"告警" haha, we probably would use "警告" but might change it to something else based on the context

[Lee-W]

"consumingAsset": "消费者资源" is a hard one 😢 it's correct but not that easy to understand

[sjyangkevin]

"告警" haha, we probably would use "警告" but might change it to something else based on the context

actually good catch! I did a quick check through the current translation, and "警告" is used. Thanks! I just pushed a fix for that

[sjyangkevin]

Would appreciate if the translation/code owner could also have a review on this:
@Fortytwoo @gyli

[gyli]

Good catch for 告警, while I also think 警报 is a more accurate translation, as 警告 means warning instead of alert. However, 警告 is already used in many other zh-CN translations consistently, so I don't think we want to change it in this PR. If we want to discuss this translation and make the change, a separated PR should be raised.

[gyli]

Others look good to me!

[sjyangkevin]

Thanks @gyli for the feedback.

[Lee-W]

hmmm... google lies to me. it told me 告警 is ok 🤦‍♂️

[Lee-W]

cool, gonna merge it now. great to see you both :)