Skip to content

[CON-2347] feat(braintree): Add Read and Write#438

Open
ejoo wants to merge 1 commit intoamp-labs:mainfrom
ejoo:feat/braintree-docs
Open

[CON-2347] feat(braintree): Add Read and Write#438
ejoo wants to merge 1 commit intoamp-labs:mainfrom
ejoo:feat/braintree-docs

Conversation

@ejoo
Copy link
Contributor

@ejoo ejoo commented Dec 29, 2025

Description

  • Update Braintree provider guide with Read and Write support

Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-12-25 at 1 33 08 AM

- Add Read Actions with incremental read support for multiple objects
- Add Write Actions for customers, transactions, and paymentMethods
- Add Supported Objects section with API documentation links
- Update example integration with read/write configuration
- Add detailed instructions for getting API credentials
@Cobalt0s Cobalt0s changed the title feat(braintree): Updated Braintree provider docs [CON-2347] feat(braintree): Add Read and Write Dec 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Cobalt0s Cobalt0s left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM


This connector uses Basic Auth, which means that you do not need to set up a Provider App before getting started. (Provider apps are only required for providers that use OAuth2 Authorization Code grant type.)
1. Log in to your [Braintree Control Panel](https://www.braintreegateway.com/login).
2. Navigate to **Settings** > **API Keys**.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the suggestion from other PRs, could you add gif here?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ejoo please attach screenshots and by pushing changes retrigger the CI. It looks like it is stuck.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments