Enhance analysis section with flight term definitions#52
Enhance analysis section with flight term definitions#52SoTi-AF wants to merge 1 commit intoairframesio:mainfrom
Conversation
Added definitions for flight-related terms and codes.
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe research document A3.md is updated to include explicit mappings for aviation codes and callsigns in its Analysis section, replacing previously abbreviated representations with fully documented identifiers for ATC facilities, airports, flight operations, and routes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
research/A3.md (1)
43-44: Two trailing blank lines at end of file.One trailing newline is conventional for Markdown files.
📝 Proposed fix
CINDY4S/SATMA2A = Standard Instrument Departure (SID) route - - +🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@research/A3.md` around lines 43 - 44, The file ends with two trailing blank lines; replace them with a single trailing newline so the Markdown ends with exactly one newline character. Edit the file's end-of-file whitespace (remove the extra blank line after the final newline) to ensure only one trailing newline remains.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@research/A3.md`:
- Line 41: Replace the non-standard label "Takeoff Runway" used in the entry "18
= Takeoff Runway" with the correct aviation terminology "Departure Runway";
locate the literal string "18 = Takeoff Runway" in the document and update it to
"18 = Departure Runway" so the wording matches ICAO/FAA PDC conventions.
- Line 39: The Analysis section currently documents DLH8NT as "Flight Number or
Callsign" but omits the equivalent GLO1557 from Example 2; update the Analysis
text to explicitly state that both DLH8NT and GLO1557 represent the Flight
Number/Callsign field (or add a second line documenting GLO1557), referencing
the exact tokens "DLH8NT" and "GLO1557" so both examples are consistently
explained.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@research/A3.md`:
- Around line 43-44: The file ends with two trailing blank lines; replace them
with a single trailing newline so the Markdown ends with exactly one newline
character. Edit the file's end-of-file whitespace (remove the extra blank line
after the final newline) to ensure only one trailing newline remains.
| ... | ||
| FRADFYA/RECCAYA = ATC Center Facility | ||
| EDDF/SBRF = Departure Airport | ||
| DLH8NT = Flight Number or Callsign |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
GLO1557 from Example 2 is undocumented in the Analysis section.
DLH8NT covers Example 1's callsign, but GLO1557 (line 19 in Example 2) is the equivalent field in the second example and is not referenced here. For consistency, both callsigns should be represented.
📝 Proposed fix
-DLH8NT = Flight Number or Callsign
+DLH8NT/GLO1557 = Flight Number or Callsign🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@research/A3.md` at line 39, The Analysis section currently documents DLH8NT
as "Flight Number or Callsign" but omits the equivalent GLO1557 from Example 2;
update the Analysis text to explicitly state that both DLH8NT and GLO1557
represent the Flight Number/Callsign field (or add a second line documenting
GLO1557), referencing the exact tokens "DLH8NT" and "GLO1557" so both examples
are consistently explained.
| EDDF/SBRF = Departure Airport | ||
| DLH8NT = Flight Number or Callsign | ||
| LJLJ/SBSP = Destination Airport | ||
| 18 = Takeoff Runway |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Non-standard aviation terminology: "Takeoff Runway" → "Departure Runway".
In aviation (ICAO, FAA PDC format), the standard term for the runway assigned in a departure clearance is "Departure Runway", not "Takeoff Runway". Using the non-standard term may cause confusion for readers familiar with official documentation.
📝 Proposed fix
-18 = Takeoff Runway
+18 = Departure Runway📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 18 = Takeoff Runway | |
| 18 = Departure Runway |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@research/A3.md` at line 41, Replace the non-standard label "Takeoff Runway"
used in the entry "18 = Takeoff Runway" with the correct aviation terminology
"Departure Runway"; locate the literal string "18 = Takeoff Runway" in the
document and update it to "18 = Departure Runway" so the wording matches
ICAO/FAA PDC conventions.
1 participant
Added definitions for flight-related terms and codes.
Summary by CodeRabbit