Skip to content

Comments

Enhance analysis section with flight data definitions#51

Open
SoTi-AF wants to merge 1 commit intoairframesio:mainfrom
SoTi-AF:patch-1
Open

Enhance analysis section with flight data definitions#51
SoTi-AF wants to merge 1 commit intoairframesio:mainfrom
SoTi-AF:patch-1

Conversation

@SoTi-AF
Copy link

@SoTi-AF SoTi-AF commented Feb 22, 2026

Added detailed explanations for flight data parameters.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Added flight metadata definitions including Oceanic Route codes, airports, waypoints, and flight parameters.

Added detailed explanations for flight data parameters.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 22, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A placeholder line in a markdown documentation file was replaced with 15 lines of code definitions mapping Oceanic Route flight metadata, including codes, timestamps, airports, waypoints, and flight parameters. No functional logic or control flow changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
research/A1.md
Expanded Analysis section with detailed code definitions for Oceanic Route flight metadata; replaced a single placeholder line with 15 lines of structured code mappings.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A runway of data, so neat and so bright,
Oceanic routes mapped in metadata light,
Waypoints and codes now dance on the page,
Documentation complete—a rabbinical stage! 🛫✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title accurately summarizes the main change: adding flight data definitions to the analysis section, which aligns with the file summary showing code-like definitions were added to research/A1.md.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@research/A1.md`:
- Line 36: Replace the incorrect expansion "Flight Management" for the symbol
"FM" in the document: update the entry that currently reads "FM = Flight
Management" to state that FM stands for "From" (ICAO phraseology) and optionally
annotate it as preposition usage in oceanic clearance text (e.g., "FM
ERAKA/0959" = "From ERAKA at 0959"); ensure the line or surrounding note
clarifies that FM is a preposition, not an avionics acronym like FMS/FMC.
- Line 40: The text "M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)" contains a stray '9' instead
of an opening parenthesis; update the string (the identifier "M085 = Mach Number
9085=0.85)") to read "M085 = Mach Number (0.85)" (fixing the parenthesis and
spacing) so the parenthetical is well-formed.
- Line 28: Fix the misspelling in the definition for PIKCLYA: change the phrase
"Oceanic Clearence" to "Oceanic Clearance" wherever that exact string appears
(specifically update the line containing PIKCLYA = ATC Center Facility issuing
the Oceanic Clearence).
- Line 31: The line labeling "EGGX = Departure Airport" is incorrect; update the
text in research/A1.md to state that EGGX is the Shanwick Oceanic FIR/OACC
identifier (issuing FIR) rather than a departure airport, and clarify that
PIKCLYA is the ATC routing address; specifically fix the CLX header example
`/PIKCLYA.OC1/CLX 0832 220611 EGGX` to reflect that EGGX identifies the issuing
oceanic FIR/OACC.

## Analysis

...
PIKCLYA = ATC Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearence
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix the spelling of "Clearence" → "Clearance".

The static analysis tool correctly flags this misspelling.

✏️ Proposed fix
-PIKCLYA = ATC Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearence
+PIKCLYA = ATC Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearance
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~28-~28: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...ATC Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearence 0832 = HHMM UTC Time Stamp 220611 = YYMM...

(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@research/A1.md` at line 28, Fix the misspelling in the definition for
PIKCLYA: change the phrase "Oceanic Clearence" to "Oceanic Clearance" wherever
that exact string appears (specifically update the line containing PIKCLYA = ATC
Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearence).

PIKCLYA = ATC Center Facility issuing the Oceanic Clearence
0832 = HHMM UTC Time Stamp
220611 = YYMMDD UTC Date Stamp
EGGX = Departure Airport
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

EGGX is the Shanwick Oceanic FIR/OACC identifier, not a "Departure Airport".

Per Shanwick's official ORCA documentation, EGGX is the ICAO 4-letter code for Shanwick — the Oceanic Area Control Centre (OACC) — not the departure airport. In the CLX message header /PIKCLYA.OC1/CLX 0832 220611 EGGX, EGGX identifies the issuing oceanic FIR. PIKCLYA already identifies the ATC routing address; EGGX is the FIR authority issuing the clearance.

✏️ Proposed fix
-EGGX = Departure Airport
+EGGX = Issuing Oceanic FIR / OACC (Shanwick)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
EGGX = Departure Airport
EGGX = Issuing Oceanic FIR / OACC (Shanwick)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@research/A1.md` at line 31, The line labeling "EGGX = Departure Airport" is
incorrect; update the text in research/A1.md to state that EGGX is the Shanwick
Oceanic FIR/OACC identifier (issuing FIR) rather than a departure airport, and
clarify that PIKCLYA is the ATC routing address; specifically fix the CLX header
example `/PIKCLYA.OC1/CLX 0832 220611 EGGX` to reflect that EGGX identifies the
issuing oceanic FIR/OACC.

KORD = Destination Airport
ERAKA = Oceanic Route Entry (Way)Point
TOXIT = Oceanic Route Exit (Way)Point
FM = Flight Management
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

FM means "From" (ICAO phraseology), not "Flight Management".

In the context of oceanic clearance text, FM ERAKA/0959 is standard ICAO phraseology for "From ERAKA at time 0959". FM is a preposition, not an abbreviation for Flight Management (which is typically FMS or FMC). Labelling it "Flight Management" would mislead readers parsing actual clearance text.

✏️ Proposed fix
-FM = Flight Management
+FM = From
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
FM = Flight Management
FM = From
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@research/A1.md` at line 36, Replace the incorrect expansion "Flight
Management" for the symbol "FM" in the document: update the entry that currently
reads "FM = Flight Management" to state that FM stands for "From" (ICAO
phraseology) and optionally annotate it as preposition usage in oceanic
clearance text (e.g., "FM ERAKA/0959" = "From ERAKA at 0959"); ensure the line
or surrounding note clarifies that FM is a preposition, not an avionics acronym
like FMS/FMC.

0959 = HHMM UTC Time over Entry (Way)Point
MNTN = Maintain
F380 = Flight Level (380=38000ft)
M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Typo: 9085=0.85) has a spurious 9 where an opening parenthesis ( was intended.

The digit 9 before 085 is clearly a typo for (, leaving the parenthetical malformed.

✏️ Proposed fix
-M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)
+M085 = Mach Number (0.85)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)
M085 = Mach Number (0.85)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@research/A1.md` at line 40, The text "M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)" contains
a stray '9' instead of an opening parenthesis; update the string (the identifier
"M085 = Mach Number 9085=0.85)") to read "M085 = Mach Number (0.85)" (fixing the
parenthesis and spacing) so the parenthetical is well-formed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant