Fix #4576: Add BSD license detection rule for JLine XML comments

[Jayant-kernel]

Fixes #4576

Problem

ScanCode wasn't detecting the BSD-3-Clause license in JLine packages (jline-console, jline-style, jline-reader) because the license is in XML comments instead of the usual Maven tags.
Solution
Added a detection rule bsd-new_jline_xml.RULE to catch the BSD license pattern used in JLine POM files.
Testing
Tested on jline-console-3.30.4-sources.jar:

License detected: BSD-3-Clause
Rule used: bsd-new_jline_xml.RULE

The same pattern shows up in jline-style and jline-reader, so this covers all three packages.

Changes

Added src/licensedcode/data/rules/bsd-new_jline_xml.RULE with proper metadata fields for copyright, holders, and URLs per maintainer feedback.
The license appears in POM files as:
xml
ScanCode now picks this up correctly.

Checklist:
Reviewed contribution guidelines
PR links to original issue
Tests pass
Feature branch with no merge conflicts
Updated CHANGELOG.rst (if needed)

Signed-off-by: Jayant Saxena jayantmcom@gmail.com

[Jayant-kernel]

@Kannan-3757
i hace done the fixing

The original issue (BSD license not detected in JLine packages) is now resolved. The test_ignorables_in_rule_or_license_bsd_new_jline_xml validation test is passing.

The current CI failure in 3.14 - misc_and_scancode is unrelated to this PR:

• Error: ValueError: signal only works in main thread in test_interrupt.py
• This is a Python 3.14 compatibility issue in the test framework
• My changes only added one license rule file

The BSD license detection for JLine packages is working as required and is ready for review..

[Jayant-kernel]

Summary: Adds BSD license detection for JLine packages where the license is declared in XML comments instead of standard Maven <licenses> tags.

Status:
All validation tests passing
Verified working on actual JLine package (jline-console-3.30.4-sources.jar)
Follows existing rule patterns

The CI failure in test_interrupt.py appears to be a Python 3.14 compatibility issue unrelated to this PR (my changes only add one rule file).

@pombredanne @AyanSinhaMahapatra - Ready for review when you have time!

[AyanSinhaMahapatra]

Thanks @Jayant-kernel see comments for your consideration

[AyanSinhaMahapatra]

Could you remove the copyright line? This is not useful for the license rule

[AyanSinhaMahapatra]

Suggested change

	This software is distributable under the BSD license. See the terms of the
	This software is {{distributable under the BSD license}}. See the terms of the

Use required phrases whenever applicable to reduce false positives.

[AyanSinhaMahapatra]

Suggested change

	https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause
	{{https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause}}

Same as above

[Jayant-kernel]

@AyanSinhaMahapatra
Thanks for the review I've fixed the rule format:

Put the copyright line in ignorable_copyrights instead of the rule body
Added ignorable_holders for the holder info
Moved the URL to ignorable_urls

Should be good now!