Skip to content

Prepare in-depth.html work (backmerge of #274)#285

Merged
camillobruni merged 1 commit intoWebKit:JetStream3.0from
camillobruni:2026-02-25_prepare_indepth_backmerge
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

Prepare in-depth.html work (backmerge of #274)#285
camillobruni merged 1 commit intoWebKit:JetStream3.0from
camillobruni:2026-02-25_prepare_indepth_backmerge

Conversation

@camillobruni
Copy link
Contributor

@camillobruni camillobruni commented Feb 25, 2026

Backmerge of #274 (ad5e397):

  • Format in-depth.html
  • Add empty in-depth.html sections for the new workloads
  • Add unit tests to check that all benchmarks have a matching in-depth entry

First steps to address #199.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Deploy Preview for webkit-jetstream-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 51ce315
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/webkit-jetstream-preview/deploys/699ebde745814e000806986d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-285--webkit-jetstream-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@camillobruni camillobruni requested a review from danleh February 25, 2026 09:10
@camillobruni camillobruni marked this pull request as draft February 25, 2026 09:11
@camillobruni camillobruni force-pushed the 2026-02-25_prepare_indepth_backmerge branch from e9a8066 to 5837eb0 Compare February 25, 2026 09:12
- Format in-depth.html
- Add empty in-depth.html sections for the new workloads
- Add unit tests to check that all benchmarks have a matching in-depth entry

First steps to address WebKit#199.
@camillobruni camillobruni reopened this Feb 25, 2026
@camillobruni camillobruni marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2026 09:16
Copy link
Contributor

@danleh danleh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, looks the same as #274, as it should. Since we already discussed this in the meeting last week, I think it's fine if you just merge this to 3.0.

@camillobruni camillobruni merged commit a48d1e6 into WebKit:JetStream3.0 Feb 25, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants