Release: 2.27.1#220
Conversation
…K-4088 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Skipping CodeAnt AI review — this PR is a back-merge between long-lived branches ( If you want to analyze this anyway (e.g. you resolved conflicts with new logic), comment |
Code Review by Qodo
1. Missing notAllowedPurposes field
|
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 3 minutes and 2 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
PR Summary by QodoRelease 2.27.1 (changelog, version bumps, test mocks) Description
Diagram
High-Level Assessment
Files changed (5)
|
|
PR Summary: Release 2.27.1: accessibility and UI fixes, build/version bumps, and test/mock updates.
|
|
Reviewed up to commit:c550d559fb4694a3ed4ea28388c6270c6d8045e8 Additional SuggestionOthers- You added new consent-related fields across languages (Swift: specialFeaturesConsentOrPay, consentOrPay; TS: consentOrPay, specialFeaturesConsentOrPay, mandatoryLabel). Please verify cross-language mapping and backward compatibility: make new fields optional in models, ensure JSON serialization/deserialization is tolerant (default values or missing-field handling), and add migration or fallback logic when older persisted consent data lacks these fields. Run full CI including native builds and integration tests before publishing.- [ ] Confirm that new consent-related fields (`consentOrPay`, `specialFeaturesConsentOrPay`, `mandatoryLabel`) are declared as optional in all public TypeScript types and Swift/Objective‑C models.
- [ ] Ensure JSON (de)serialization tolerates missing values from older native SDKs / stored payloads by providing safe defaults (e.g., `undefined`/`nil` or empty collections) and no non-null assertions.
- [ ] Add or update integration tests to cover scenarios where these new fields are omitted from the payload, verifying that parsing and existing flows still work. |
No description provided.