Skip to content

Update ca53 metrics - #4451

Draft
jfgava wants to merge 1 commit into
The-OpenROAD-Project:masterfrom
The-OpenROAD-Project-staging:update-metrics-ca53-ndr
Draft

Update ca53 metrics#4451
jfgava wants to merge 1 commit into
The-OpenROAD-Project:masterfrom
The-OpenROAD-Project-staging:update-metrics-ca53-ndr

Conversation

@jfgava

@jfgava jfgava commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

designs/gf12/ca53/rules-base.json updates:

Metric Old New Type
finish__timing__hold__tns -1600.0 -2520.0 Failing

Signed-off-by: Jonas Gava <jfgava@precisioninno.com>
@jfgava jfgava self-assigned this Aug 20, 2026

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request relaxes the finish__timing__hold__tns threshold from -1600.0 to -2520.0 in the base rules. Feedback indicates that this change allows significant hold violations to pass CI, which poses a high risk to silicon functionality. It is recommended to resolve the underlying hold violations, potentially by enabling incremental repair, rather than relaxing the threshold.

},
"finish__timing__hold__tns": {
"value": -1600.0,
"value": -2520.0,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

Relaxing the finish__timing__hold__tns threshold to -2520.0 allows significant hold violations to pass CI. Hold violations are fatal to silicon functionality and cannot be mitigated by reducing clock frequency. Accepting a large negative hold TNS of -2520.0 increases the risk of masking critical physical design failures. Instead of relaxing this threshold, resolve the underlying hold violations. For example, enabling incremental repair in config.mk (by setting SKIP_INCREMENTAL_REPAIR to 0 or removing it) allows the optimizer to fix these hold violations automatically.

@jfgava
jfgava marked this pull request as draft August 20, 2026 17:40
@openroad-ci

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔍 QoR check

Metrics reflect the PR merge build — i.e. what will land on the target branch. Advisory — results are log-only and do not affect build status. The authoritative QoR gate remains the local rules-file check.

Commit a372133 · Jenkins build #1 · Baseline: build

62 design(s) checked — 0 with regression(s), 0 without a comparable baseline.
Design Variant Verdict local vs inline passed / failed / missing
asap7/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/aes-block base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/aes-mbff base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/aes_lvt base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/cva6 base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 12 / 0 / 0
asap7/ethmac base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/ethmac_lvt base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/gcd-ccs base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/jpeg_lvt base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/mock-alu base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/mock-cpu base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/riscv32i base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/riscv32i-mock-sram base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/swerv_wrapper base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
asap7/uart base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/aes-hybrid base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/riscv32i base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gf180/uart-blocks base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gt2n/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gt2n/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
gt2n/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/i2c-gpio-expander base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/riscv32i base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
ihp-sg13g2/spi base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/ariane133 base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/ariane136 base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/black_parrot base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/bp_be_top base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/bp_fe_top base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/bp_multi_top base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/cva6 base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/dynamic_node base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/mempool_group base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 12 / 0 / 0
nangate45/swerv base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/swerv_wrapper base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
nangate45/tinyRocket base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/chameleon base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/microwatt base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hd/riscv32i base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hs/aes base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hs/gcd base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hs/ibex base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hs/jpeg base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0
sky130hs/riscv32i base ✅ pass ✅ MATCH 25 / 0 / 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants