fix: remodel vertex-weight-limit's mech arm as an actual machine#80
Merged
Conversation
The previous asset read as stacked barrels with a pool-float elbow and horn claws: the 'boot' hid the joint, the prongs were thin spikes, and the forearm was stubby while the upper arm was long. Rebuilt as a machine: bolted pedestal and shoulder fairing, shoulder hub, upper arm ending in clevis cheeks, the elbow hinge pin capped through a ribbed flex bellows, a long plated forearm, wrist bellows and collar, palm, and a three-finger two-segment gripper. The teal accent still marks the pruned-weight zones (bellows at the elbow hinge and wrist). Every check contract holds on the remodel: the flex bellows keep the z ranges the five-bone bumps are tuned for (pre_max=5), and measured values are identical on 5.1.2 and 4.5.11 (verts=1840, limited=128, sum 2.98e-08, pose 2.73e-03, lbs 2.67e-07). Re-falsified: probe A exit 4, probe B exit 6 (1.269e-02), probe C exit 8 (1.796). No tolerance loosened. Signed-off-by: fOuttaMyPaint <TMhospitalitystrategies@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The maintainer flagged the deployed hero: the previous asset read as stacked barrels with a pool-float elbow and horn claws — not a mech arm. Honest diagnosis: the 'boot' hid the joint entirely, the prongs were thin spikes reading as horns, and proportions were inverted (stubby forearm, long upper arm).
Remodel (build_arm rewritten), keeping every check contract:
Contract preservation: the flex bellows keep the z ranges the five-bone bumps are tuned for, so
pre_max=5holds; no count assertions exist in this example's check (verified: it asserts influence counts, sums, pose, LBS, root pin — no totals). Measured values identical on both binaries:verts=1840 pre=5 post=4 limited=128 sum_err=2.98e-08 pose_dev=2.73e-03 lbs_err=2.67e-07 root_move=0.Re-falsified on the remodel (5.1.2): probe A (no limit) exit 4; probe B (no renormalize) exit 6 (sums 1.269e-02); probe C (no vertex groups) exit 8 (LBS dev 1.796). No tolerance loosened. README intro/render paragraph and the top-level README alt text updated to the new part descriptions; group contact sheet refreshed (luminance 111.4, in set range).
Live-run verification: check + render on
.scratch/blender-5.1.2-windows-x64/blender.exe(Blender 5.1.2) and.scratch/blender-4.5.11-windows-x64/blender.exe(Blender 4.5.11 LTS); pixels inspected at full size (gripper and elbow crops) and card crop. Render path green on both.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Kimi Code