-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: resolve API key config mismatch and Pydantic model row collection #55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
StatPan
wants to merge
1
commit into
master
Choose a base branch
from
fix/api-key-config-and-collect-rows
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pydantic 모델을 처리할 때
model_dump()를 호출하고 즉시rows에 추가한 뒤return하는 방식은, 해당 모델이 개별 데이터 행(row)이 아닌 전체 응답을 감싸는 컨테이너(Wrapper) 모델일 경우 문제를 일으킬 수 있습니다. 국회 API의 특성상 응답 객체는 여러 계층으로 중첩되어 있으며, 실제 데이터 행은 특정 키("row") 아래의 리스트에 존재합니다.만약
assembly_client가 반환하는 모델이 전체 응답 구조를 유지하고 있다면, 이 로직은 개별 데이터 행이 아닌 전체 응답 객체 하나를rows에 담게 되어 이후의 데이터 파싱(예:_build_bill) 과정에서 필드 누락으로 인한 오류가 발생할 수 있습니다. 모델을 dict로 변환한 후 내부 구조를 계속 탐색(walk)하여 실제 데이터 행을 찾도록 하거나, 모델이 컨테이너인지 개별 행인지에 따라 분기 처리하는 것이 더 안전합니다.