Skip to content

🦅 ContentHawk - Use Pre-activation steps rather than exceptions for checking issue relevance#12782

Merged
Calinator444 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/add-contenthawk-workflows
May 27, 2026
Merged

🦅 ContentHawk - Use Pre-activation steps rather than exceptions for checking issue relevance#12782
Calinator444 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/add-contenthawk-workflows

Conversation

@Calinator444
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Calinator444 Calinator444 commented May 27, 2026

Description

This PR updates contenthawk-snapshot-done to use pre-activation steps to check if the closed issue was relevant rather than throwing an error. This doesn't functionally change how the workflow works, but it means when the workflow is skipped it will not show up as an error in GitHub actions.

Changes based on this PR (I just used GitHub scripts instead since it's easier to read): #12767

Note

This PR was Generated by the 🦅ContentHawk installer because I wanted to roll out the fix for ContentHawk in general.

Screenshot

CleanShot 2026-05-28 at 08 47 14

Figure: Workflows being skipped on test repo

Fixed

#12766

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old label May 27, 2026
@Calinator444 Calinator444 changed the title 🦅 Installing ContentHawk 🦅 ContentHawk - Use Pre-activation steps rather than exceptions for checking issue relevance May 27, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@18-th 18-th left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Calinator444 Calinator444 merged commit 6c44a5e into main May 27, 2026
5 checks passed
@Calinator444 Calinator444 deleted the feat/add-contenthawk-workflows branch May 27, 2026 23:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Age: 🥚 - New About 2 hours old

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants