Skip to content

Add Indiana blind or disabled property tax credit (SEA 1, 2025)#9007

Open
DTrim99 wants to merge 2 commits into
PolicyEngine:mainfrom
DTrim99:in-blind-disabled-property-tax-credit
Open

Add Indiana blind or disabled property tax credit (SEA 1, 2025)#9007
DTrim99 wants to merge 2 commits into
PolicyEngine:mainfrom
DTrim99:in-blind-disabled-property-tax-credit

Conversation

@DTrim99

@DTrim99 DTrim99 commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Adds Indiana's blind or disabled property tax credit, created by Senate Enrolled Act 1 (2025) (P.L.68-2025), SEC. 84, adding IC 6-1.1-51.3-2.

The credit is $125 for a blind or disabled owner of a principal residence, with no income limit, for property taxes first due and payable in 2026 and after. It is modeled as blind_or_disabled × min($125, real_estate_taxes), so a credit never exceeds the liability and renters (with no real estate taxes) receive $0.

Changes

  • New variable in_blind_disabled_property_tax_credit (TaxUnit, defined_for = StateCode.IN): $125 if any head or spouse is blind or disabled, capped at the property tax liability.
  • New parameter gov.states.in.tax.property.blind_disabled_credit.amount ($125, from 2026).
  • Wired into the 2026 block of state_property_tax_credits.yaml, alongside in_over_65_property_tax_credit and in_supplemental_homestead_credit.

Context

This is the third and final SEA 1 flat property-tax credit:

The SEA 1 veteran credits were repealed by HEA 1427-2025 (veterans keep their pre-existing deductions), so they are intentionally not modeled.

Tests

in_blind_disabled_property_tax_credit.yaml covers: blind homeowner (→ $125), disabled homeowner (→ $125), the liability cap ($80 tax → $80), neither blind nor disabled (→ $0), blind renter with no property tax (→ $0), and non-IN resident (→ $0).

References

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Senate Enrolled Act 1 (2025), SEC. 84, adds IC 6-1.1-51.3-2, a $125
property tax credit for a blind or disabled owner of a principal residence,
with no income limit, for property taxes first due and payable in 2026 and
after. The credit cannot exceed the property tax liability.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ff39625) to head (23f366d).
⚠️ Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #9007   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           18        18           
=========================================
  Hits            18        18           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

- Add a test that a blind DEPENDENT (not head/spouse) yields no credit,
  exercising the head_or_spouse restriction.
- Add a married-couple test where only the spouse is blind (-> $125),
  exercising the multi-member tax_unit.any() aggregation.
- Trim the verbose formula comment to two lines (matching the sibling
  over_65 credit style).
- Anchor the enrolled-bill reference to page 143 (SEC. 84 / IC 6-1.1-51.3-2,
  where the $125 amount appears).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@DTrim99

DTrim99 commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Independent review + fixes applied

Independent review confirmed the credit is regulatorily correct — the $125 blind/disabled credit (IC 6-1.1-51.3-2) is verified on page 143 of the enrolled SEA 1 ("the amount of the credit is equal to one hundred twenty-five [dollars]"), no income limit, 2026+, and the repealed veteran credits are correctly not modeled. No critical issues. Applied the findings:

🟡 Should Address — fixed (test coverage)

  • & head_or_spouse now exercised: added a case with a blind dependent child (head/spouse not blind), real_estate_taxes > 0$0. Deleting the head/spouse clause would now fail.
  • Multi-member .any() now exercised: added a married couple where only the spouse is blind$125, confirming the spouse path and cross-person aggregation.

🟢 Suggestions — applied

  • Trimmed the 5-line formula comment to two lines (matching the sibling in_over_65 style).
  • Anchored the enrolled-bill reference to #page=143 (SEC. 84 / IC 6-1.1-51.3-2).

⚠️ Scope note

Like the other property-tax credits, this flows only into taxsim_state_property_tax_credit (TAXSIM parity), not household_net_income — pre-existing/systemic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant