Skip to content

Conversation

@VeckoTheGecko
Copy link
Contributor

I was chatting with Justus yesterday, and he mentioned improvements we can make to our CI setup. I've also wrapped a couple of my own in.

Changes

  • Update should-skip-ci to should-run-ci , failing if we shouldn't (which implicitly skips the rest of the workflows)
  • Update workflow graph to a chain (rather than directly depending on should-skip-ci and cache-pixi-lock)
  • Update the should-run-ci and cache-pixi-lock to be run using slim instances (faster startup and lower resources)

@VeckoTheGecko
Copy link
Contributor Author

VeckoTheGecko commented Jan 21, 2026

  • Update workflow graph to a chain

Before

image

Now the graph is

image

Copy link
Member

@erikvansebille erikvansebille left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@VeckoTheGecko VeckoTheGecko merged commit 805b7c4 into Parcels-code:v4-dev Jan 21, 2026
12 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Backlog to Done in Parcels development Jan 21, 2026
@VeckoTheGecko VeckoTheGecko deleted the ci branch January 21, 2026 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants