Feature: Bridge deck overlays for vanilla infrastructure types#105
Merged
zephyris merged 1 commit intoOpenTTD:masterfrom Jan 3, 2026
Merged
Feature: Bridge deck overlays for vanilla infrastructure types#105zephyris merged 1 commit intoOpenTTD:masterfrom
zephyris merged 1 commit intoOpenTTD:masterfrom
Conversation
zephyris
force-pushed
the
bridge-deck-overlays
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b65a301 to
477667e
Compare
Contributor
Author
Tested and all looks good.
|
zephyris
force-pushed
the
bridge-deck-overlays
branch
from
477667e to
6a195d9
Compare
2TallTyler
reviewed
Jan 2, 2026
PeterN
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An (untested) addition of the bridge deck overlays for vanilla infrastructure. For normal climates and toyland-specific road and rail (maglev and monorail styles appear to not be toyland-unique).
Haven't had a chance to test, but it builds and I think it's correct.
Fixes #104