Add tail light to vehicle classification/light state#845
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
jdsika
commented
Nov 28, 2024
- resolves Missing corresponding light status for rear light. #844
* resolves #844 Signed-off-by: Carlo van Driesten <carlo.van-driesten@bmw.de>
PhRosenberger
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2024
Member
|
@thomassedlmayer : Could you please review this in the Sensor modeling project meeting? Thank you |
Contributor
|
Approved by sensor modeling working group (2025-04-30). |
thomassedlmayer
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@yash-shah-asam is there a rule who is allowed to merge or are we checking boxes? (approved by group, expert and CCB?) |
Contributor
|
ASAM OSI CCB 2025-05-08: Approved to merge |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.