Merged
Conversation
- Add static/description/index.html fix: use include instead of extend in js function inheritance. fix: not overwriting the existing object references with the result of the include fix: update name according to new module name. fix: error when displaying many2many field without options defined.
[ADD] support 'no_open_edit' on many2one [FIX] typos
…and make the module installable [MIG] adapt form.js to the new API. [FIX] Fix bug mentioned in pull OCA#262. [MIG] Make the module installable.
…th `options={'open': True}` it always open the first element with this fix it will open the right one
* [FIX][web_m2x_options] Fix Qweb templates.
They were trying to replace non-existing elements, and this was being logged to console:
Can't find "a.oe_m2o_cm_button" when extending template FieldMany2One
Can't find "span.badge" when extending template FieldMany2ManyTag
* Raise version correctly.
* [FIX] Make many2many_tags tag deletion work again
* Correct replacement of event
Instead of overwriting all events from upstream widget, better just overwrite the one you need and inherit the rest.
* fix unecessary calls Do check_access_rights and disable_quick_create calls only once per field.
…ser does not have creation permission.
`web_m2x_options` is supposed to render fields in the context of a form or tree view, where domains can safely be applied because there's a main record that includes a context. However, when installing along with `web_advanced_search_x2x`, they produce an incompatibility when a x2x field's domain is defined and depends on the current record's context, because a search view has no notion of a *current record*. The fix is simple: try to do as usual, and if it fails, try without the field's domain. Without this patch, an exception like this would be raised, i.e. when both addons are installed and you are trying to search project tasks by stage: ``` Error: NameError: name 'project_id' is not defined http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:370# Traceback:# Changes to be committed: PY_ensurepy@http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:370:19# modified: static/src/js/form.js py.evaluate@http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:1340:20# py.evaluate@http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:1397:35 py.evaluate@http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:1409:34 py.eval@http://localhost/web/static/lib/py.js/lib/py.js:1453:16 eval_domains/<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:869:39 _.forEach@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:145:9 _.mixin/</_.prototype[name]@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:1484:29 eval_domains@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:860:5 eval_domains/<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:873:39 _.forEach@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:145:9 _.mixin/</_.prototype[name]@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:1484:29 eval_domains@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:860:5 eval_domains/<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:873:39 _.forEach@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:145:9 _.mixin/</_.prototype[name]@http://localhost/web/static/lib/underscore/underscore.js:1484:29 eval_domains@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:860:5 pyeval@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:977:16 eval_arg@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:988:16 ensure_evaluated@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/pyeval.js:1011:21 call@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/data_model.js:56:9 name_search@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/data.js:537:16 get_search_result@http://localhost/web_m2x_options/static/src/js/form.js:130:50 OdooClass.extend/Class.include/</prototype[name]</<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/framework/class.js:122:35 source@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/views/form_relational_widgets.js:271:17 _search@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:6823:3 $.widget/</proxiedPrototype[prop]</<@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:415:19 search@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:6815:10 $.widget/</proxiedPrototype[prop]</<@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:415:19 $.widget.bridge/$.fn[name]/<@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:508:19 each@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:383:49 each@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:136:24 $.widget.bridge/$.fn[name]@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery.ui/jquery-ui.js:494:4 render_editable/<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/views/form_relational_widgets.js:189:21 dispatch@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:4640:50 add/elemData.handle@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:4309:41 ```
web_m2x_options: Fix usage for non-admins web_m2x_options: Reduce rpc calls web_m2x_options: Update manifest and readme
Currently translated at 91.7% (11 of 12 strings) Translation: web-11.0/web-11.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-11-0/web-11-0-web_m2x_options/pt_BR/
The method `_onOpenColorPicker` is defined on `FormFieldMany2ManyTags`, not in `FieldMany2ManyTags`, so it can only be called on its descendants.
Otherwise, clicking on a `many2many_tags` tag when found in a tree view produces an error such as:
TypeError: self._onOpenColorPicker is not a function
http://localhost/web_m2x_options/static/src/js/form.js:354
Rastreo de error:
_onOpenBadge@http://localhost/web_m2x_options/static/src/js/form.js:354:17
proxy/<@http://localhost/web/static/src/js/core/mixins.js:279:20
dispatch@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:4640:50
add/elemData.handle@http://localhost/web/static/lib/jquery/jquery.js:4309:41
(cherry picked from commit ddbbe81)
Currently translated at 91.7% (11 of 12 strings) Translation: web-12.0/web-12.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-12-0/web-12-0-web_m2x_options/fr/
Currently translated at 100.0% (12 of 12 strings) Translation: web-12.0/web-12.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-12-0/web-12-0-web_m2x_options/fr/
Currently translated at 100.0% (12 of 12 strings) Translation: web-12.0/web-12.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-12-0/web-12-0-web_m2x_options/pt_BR/
Currently translated at 100.0% (12 of 12 strings) Translation: web-12.0/web-12.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-12-0/web-12-0-web_m2x_options/zh_CN/
Member
|
Yes |
Contributor
|
@Alexgars73 can you do the squash so that we can merge? |
Update translation files Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate. Translation: web-17.0/web-17.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-17-0/web-17-0-web_m2x_options/ [BOT] post-merge updates [UPD] Update web_m2x_options.pot
…KanbanMany2OneAvatarUserField
… and Many2ManyTagsAvatarField
…sAvatarField ListMany2ManyTagsAvatarField already extends from Many2ManyTagsAvatarField
…ify related code.
[BOT] post-merge updates
Many2OneReferenceField inherits the props definition from Many2OneField but does not inherit the prototype methods added via patch() on many2OneField, including m2o_options_props() without this patch, calling extractProps() on Many2OneReferenceField leads to "this.m2o_options_props is not a function" errors because this method is undefined this fix adds a no-op m2o_options_props() implementation on Many2OneReferenceField to ensure compatibility and safely bypass the m2o_options_props logic since it's not relevant for reference fields [BOT] post-merge updates
Translated using Weblate (Japanese) Currently translated at 100.0% (2 of 2 strings) Translation: web-18.0/web-18.0-web_m2x_options Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/web-18-0/web-18-0-web_m2x_options/ja/
69f58d0 to
32ab325
Compare
Author
|
@pedrobaeza @CRogos done, if you can check if it's correct. |
Contributor
|
Hello @OCA/web-maintainers can you pls take a look and possibly trigger merge? |
|
Ping |
Contributor
|
@pedrobaeza can you merge? I don't think @OCA/web-maintainers is working. |
Member
|
/ocabot merge nobump |
Contributor
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
Contributor
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3ad4c97. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Migration to v19